On TV.com: Which Shows Are About to Get the AXE?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 14:
Next »
« Previous
Actually
AT&T's formal statement about Google Voice was ambiguous! A proper
blog would have quoted it and discussed this fact. Because if you
interpret their statement literally, you realize AT&T didn't say anything
you probably didn't already believe: that AT&T doesn't do the actual
flipping of the switch that puts iPhone apps on and takes them off the
store. Naturally, Apple would be the one to initiate the switch, but one
has to believe AT&T influences the decision, and hopefully the FCC finds
out just how much influence AT&T wields.

In addition to quoting and discussing what AT&T actually said, you could
have detailed the internal reasons Apple itself might want Google Voice off
the iPhone. For instance, is Apple developing its own Voice? Is that one of
the reasons for Apple building a huge data center in North Carolina?
Posted by: dogbreath1   Posted on: 08/19/09  (Edited: 08/19/2009 @ 12:53) You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I agree, this is M$'s fault  NonZealot | 08/19/09
Of course it is  Loverock Davidson | 08/19/09
Actually  dogbreath1 | 08/19/09
Ambiguous?  Sleeper Service | 08/19/09
Ambiguity  DannyO_0x98 | 08/19/09
Really?  handydan918 | 08/20/09
iPhone = innovation?????  kd5auq | 08/19/09
A la carte cable? Riiiight.  James T. Kirk | 08/19/09
RE: WSJ wrongly blames AT&T for Google Voice iPhone app rejection  PMUP | 08/19/09
Interesting timing  Pliny the Elder | 08/19/09
AT&T is dying  Douglas Ward | 08/19/09
What about SMS and long distance calling?  abmd1234 | 08/20/09
RE: WSJ wrongly blames AT&T for Google Voice iPhone app rejection  milimili | 08/20/09
RE: WSJ wrongly blames AT&T for Google Voice iPhone app rejection  cbs1947 | 08/20/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

Meet Doc