On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 42:
Next »
Microsoft spend too much on R&D for the return, IBM spend right amount
IBM has always been a set of collective businesses with a management that is without technology bias. This is a powerful formula for long term success.

Microsoft by comparison is pretty much a one trick pony to date, with the Desktop being their jelly bean product, a success that they've failed to replicate in other markets to date.
This is similar to Xerox.

On the face of it, IBM's management is hardly ever in the news, predicting the future, and railing against competitors, whereas this is common in Microsoft.

You could say that Microsoft's one off success was driven by the personal vision and drive of the individuals in charge. However, history pretty much predicts that this means there will be no follow up business. Xerox had Desktop technology, but failed to realise it. IBM had Desktop technology, but was outcompeted by microsoft.

And in many ways, this was one big project: IBM funded microsoft's development, microsoft took on the team from Xerox.

Microsoft won that by vision and drive. IBM will never have this vision and drive for one individual target.

But then once the vision and drive for the single product is done, IBM keeps motoring on other projects, whereas Microsoft will probably continue to fail to succeed in other projects (but spend a fortune trying to replicate their success, which incidentally was largely achieved without massive R&D $$$).

This is very much tortoise and hare. IBM's tortoise keeps rolling and lives to 100, the hare blasts along for a bit, maybe finishes one or two races first, but then drops dead.

There is no right and wrong here. Our world is enriched by both development models, and would be worse without either of them.

Microsoft could try to become an IBM, but I think Microsoft just isn't built right, and at the end of the day, how many IBMs do you need?
Posted by: stevey_d   Posted on: 05/14/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Microsoft spend too much on R&D for the return, IBM spend right amount  stevey_d | 05/14/09
That's not actually right you know  wolf_z | 05/14/09
i just wish  gnesterenko | 05/14/09
They are loosing money on the Xbox...  mrlinux | 05/14/09
Actually, I believe they're at least breaking even on hardware  wolf_z | 05/14/09
RE: Gauging the return on R&D: Do tech giants spend too much?  Loverock Davidson | 05/14/09
zip [ x | x - [1 .. 4] ], ["Research","Develop","???","Profit"]  DannyO_0x98 | 05/14/09
It's not just how much you spend, but how you spend it  T1Oracle | 05/14/09
FOSS improves ROI on R&D  Linux Geek | 05/14/09
Troll alert...  Soulstorm | 05/14/09
Let's see the list. (nt)  bjbrock | 05/14/09
get writing  shis-ka-bob | 05/15/09
O'RLY?  mikefarinha | 05/14/09
Technically Firefox was around before Internet ....  mrlinux | 05/14/09
Mosaic  mikefarinha | 05/14/09
Samba antedates IIS  CodeCurmudgeon | 05/14/09
Firefox 'stealing' from Microsoft !?  shis-ka-bob | 05/15/09
OpenOffice.org vs. Office  shis-ka-bob | 05/15/09
Stealing market share?  jbroche18 | 05/15/09
FOSS R&D = Copy what others do.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/14/09
Kerberos  shis-ka-bob | 05/15/09
I won't argue...  wolf_z | 05/14/09
RE: Gauging the return on R&D: Do tech giants spend too much?  gnesterenko | 05/14/09
Agreed  mikefarinha | 05/14/09
People like this scare me.  mikefarinha | 05/14/09
me too  laxmanb | 05/14/09
I'm sure he's just a bean counter  CodeCurmudgeon | 05/14/09
RE: Apple and Research  gerhart | 05/14/09
I agree...  CowLauncher | 05/14/09
Then what's the annual half Billion dollars for?  Ken_z | 05/14/09
R&D is fine if there are returns.  magallanes | 05/14/09
RE: Gauging the return on R&D: Do tech giants spend too much?  CodeCurmudgeon | 05/14/09
Microsoft manages "R&D" brillliantly...  Rick S._z | 05/14/09
TrueType NOT invented by MS  Mr_Dave | 05/14/09
And the (MS) bought TrueType as well.  Bruizer | 05/14/09
Please consult Wikipedia  shis-ka-bob | 05/15/09
RE: Gauging the return on R&D: Do tech giants spend too much?  draciron@... | 05/14/09
Greatest R&D opportunity missed  Roger Ramjet | 05/14/09
Larry, wrong question  vmirchan | 05/15/09
Responding to the title only...  D. W. Bierbaum | 05/15/09
RE: Gauging the return on R&D: Do tech giants spend too much?  shadfurman | 05/18/09
Lack of innovation is hurting IT industry NOW.  terry flores | 05/19/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc