On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Best College Towns to Live In
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 15 of 36:
Next »
« Previous
Why you're funding it.
This is information the government has done a -very- poor job of disseminating.

The reason you're funding it is because the outgoing analog broadcast system uses a wide band of electromagnetic spectrum. The digital signal uses much less. The change frees up a considerable portion of the public airways.

This allows the feds to do at least two things. First, some of the liberated frequencies will be turned over to emergency responders like police, firefighters, etc. so they can all be on the same push. Emergency responses during the Sept. 11th attacks were handicapped by the responding agencies being unable to communicate with each other. Second, some of the frequencies will be leased to communications companies. The lease payments will far exceed the paltry amount spent to fund converter boxes.
Posted by: Palmetto   Posted on: 01/27/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Push Broadband, Delay Digital TV?  BobWarfield | 01/26/09
Holy Arrogance Batman.  TripleII | 01/26/09
Dude...They have had time  JT82 | 01/26/09
Just a data point.  TripleII | 01/26/09
That scenario I didn't consider  D-cat | 01/26/09
RE: Dude....Thay had time  prodoti3 | 02/07/09
I had no problem getting the coupons...  D-cat | 01/26/09
Fair enough.  TripleII | 01/26/09
The story, not you, I thought had the tone. (nt)  TripleII | 01/26/09
It's television.  Palmetto | 01/27/09
But, but, but...  JohnMcGrew@... | 01/27/09
Good Case for the Poor  sboverie@... | 01/27/09
RE: Senate OKs unnecessary delay to digital TV switch  arrohd | 01/26/09
Get a grip.  TripleII | 01/26/09
Why you're funding it.  Palmetto | 01/27/09
RE: Senate OKs unnecessary delay to digital TV switch  orasac | 01/26/09
To Do list, one check  D-cat | 01/26/09
RE: Senate OKs unnecessary delay to digital TV switch  Boutmar | 01/27/09
--? and let's be truthful about it --?  jefflass | 01/27/09
RE: Senate OKs unnecessary delay to digital TV switch  MarkSpeevak | 01/27/09
RE: Senate OKs unnecessary delay to digital TV switch  bill.porritt@... | 01/27/09
RE: Senate OKs unnecessary delay to digital TV switch  kzot | 01/27/09
Elitism reigns supreme...  the.ksmm | 01/27/09
If $40 is "unaffordable" to you...  JohnMcGrew@... | 01/27/09
How about $500-$800, not $40  john@... | 01/27/09
Comcast is sitting pretty  silversidhe | 01/28/09
RE: Senate OKs unnecessary delay to digital TV switch  my69gymshorts@... | 01/28/09
Why not lease the radio spectrum?  govmtman | 01/28/09
HD TV is NOT DTV  JT82 | 01/29/09
Japan has had HDTV while we hang on to the trailing edge of technology.  softwareFlunky | 01/29/09
Again HDTV is NOT DTV [NT]  JT82 | 02/06/09
converter boxes hard to use  janitorman | 02/06/09
RE: Senate OKs unnecessary delay to digital TV switch  prodoti3 | 02/07/09
government = stupid  rick. | 02/07/09
RE: Senate OKs unnecessary delay to digital TV switch  cfbrehm@... | 02/07/09
RE: Senate OKs unnecessary delay to digital TV switch  xoldxcowboyx | 02/21/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here