On CNET: Keep your software up-to-date
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 17:
Next »
« Previous
Amazon not strictly Linux
EC2 does offer Windows server 2003 instances for a bit more per hour.
Posted by: hamobu   Posted on: 01/23/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Now this is where it makes sense.  storm14k | 12/18/08
Keep local backups.  CobraA1 | 12/18/08
Why would hosted services imply....  storm14k | 12/18/08
RE: Migrating to Amazon Web Services: The blueprint  tfoydel | 12/18/08
Amazin' Amazon  aureolin@... | 12/18/08
RE: Amazin' Amazon  i_okk@... | 12/18/08
While this all sounds cool, cheap, etc., but..  dinosaur_z | 12/18/08
And thus your company becomes uncompetitive  dano-z | 12/18/08
Dig out of the mud  pwatson | 12/18/08
Amazon not strictly Linux  hamobu | 01/23/09
RE: Migrating to Amazon Web Services: The blueprint  phorvath@... | 12/18/08
your article  thesoaguy | 12/18/08
RE: Migrating to Amazon Web Services: The blueprint  Nagesh Tummala | 12/29/08
No reason why you can't keep local backup  hamobu | 01/23/09
EC2 also good for one time projects  hamobu | 01/23/09
RE: Migrating to Amazon Web Services: The blueprint  devils_advocate | 02/15/09
RE: Migrating to Amazon Web Services: The blueprint  Greg.Higgins@... | 07/07/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads