On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 13 of 16:
Next »
« Previous
Intereference?
I'm a bit worried - there's a reason why those "white spaces" are in there, and it's called interference. Not the business kind, the electromagnetic kind. As much as we like to pretend that we can somehow avoid the interference issues, the truth is that we've been doing a terrible job at it. I've been using enough wireless products to know better than to believe any claims that using the "white spaces" between channels is not going to interfere with the channels themselves.
Posted by: CobraA1   Posted on: 11/05/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Co-opting  Anton Philidor | 11/05/08
CB, WiFi, FRS, VOIP, etc, etc,  kd5auq | 11/05/08
RE: FCC opens up wireless 'white spaces;' Assessing winners, losers and wild-cards  mhm200 | 11/05/08
Channel Choice is coming?  LVKen7 | 11/05/08
What makes you think he'd do that?  derbaff | 11/05/08
How can they be "losers"?  readwryt@... | 11/05/08
Broadcast licenses  CodeCurmudgeon | 11/05/08
RE: FCC opens up wireless 'white spaces;' Assessing winners, losers and wild-cards  Unemployed IT Guy | 11/05/08
RE: FCC opens up wireless 'white spaces;' Assessing winners, losers and wild-cards  verno_58@... | 11/05/08
Pro-Audio will be a loser  jessejtr | 11/05/08
So I ask you...  readwryt@... | 11/05/08
wimax  chengg11@... | 11/05/08
Intereference?  CobraA1 | 11/05/08
You can now interfere with your neighbor  BrettGlass | 11/05/08
Guess again  shanedr | 11/11/08
White Space Tech not just for Internet Broadband  OracleDivine | 11/19/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement