On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 25:
Next »
« Previous
You need to Re-Read me, ZDNet -- We AGREE...
My whole "semi-rant" was that NASA largely PREVENTED private enterprise from doing the actual "grunt work" part of space exploration for most of the past 50 years... For a LONG TIME, the government and Air Force treated NASA as a sort of national security issue, and while they were more than happy to let GOVERNMENT-OWNED-AND-OPERATED ROCKETS send private communications satellites and so forth into space, the impression I got all during the 70s and 80s, at least, was that allowing private companies to actually develop and launch THEIR OWN space-capable vehicles was verboten, considered something of a "national security issue," perhaps because of the Cold War?

So my whole point is that we should have had PRIVATE ENTERPRISE working on this sort of project A LONG TIME AGO... It's a WHOLE LOT BETTER than private enterprises favorite NEW high-profit industry -- especially for the Military-Industrial complex -- a slow-burning, unending "war on terror" almost TOTALLY outsourced to private companies like Haliburton and Blackwater with no-bid contracts at HIGH profit rates and paid by American tax dollars while projects to help the poor or pay for medical care for everyone are cut or non-existent.

Everyone read Naomi Klein's 2007 book "The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism" for a REAL eye-opening experience on just what is REALLY going on with global capitalism and the so-called "free market." The level of lies we're being told and how much of our money is being blown to enrich a few big corporations is mind-blowing! A bit off-topic, I know, BUT, my point is, private enterprise doing space travel is finally something RIGHT for a change.
Posted by: Jeff Hayes   Posted on: 01/23/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Spaceship Two  kamenit53 | 01/23/08
RE: Flight profile (Virgin Galactic models SpaceShipTwo)  EmporerEJ | 01/23/08
RE: Flight profile (Virgin Galactic models SpaceShipTwo)  royallenstagg1@... | 01/23/08
RE: Flight profile (Virgin Galactic models SpaceShipTwo)  fred@... | 01/23/08
Correction  polkrussel@... | 01/23/08
Typos are better than ignoring  fred@... | 01/23/08
T twice and "a" instead of "u"  tikigawd | 01/24/08
RE: Flight profile (Virgin Galactic models SpaceShipTwo)  Jeff Hayes | 01/23/08
Private enterprise  zdnet@... | 01/23/08
You need to Re-Read me, ZDNet -- We AGREE...  Jeff Hayes | 01/23/08
CAN you STOP writing LIKE this PLEASE  tikigawd | 01/24/08
History repeats  polkrussel@... | 01/23/08
Absolute bunk  reedjjjr | 01/23/08
NASA is NOT for forwarding...  mnottfam@... | 01/24/08
Carbon Fooprint !!!  neil.postlethwaite@... | 01/23/08
How ignorant  Takalok | 01/24/08
Carbon Footprint  neil.postlethwaite@... | 01/24/08
The fall of Icarus  sphillips@... | 01/24/08
RE: Flight profile (Virgin Galactic models SpaceShipTwo)  zoroaster | 01/24/08
France and its carbon footprint  mdean@... | 01/24/08
No such thing as a "Carbon Footprint"  cncmikes@... | 01/25/08
are you an idiot?  ellmondo | 01/26/08
You can be converted to Realism!  cncmikes@... | 01/27/08
Microsoft TOO!  ballmerstv@... | 01/26/08
France's Pollution Issue  Stan.S.Sorensen | 01/28/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement