On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 10:
Next »
Why is per socket OK while per core not?
They're essentially the same thing. Not sure why one is/was acceptable while the other is not.
Posted by: ye   Posted on: 03/02/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Why is per socket OK while per core not?  ye | 03/02/07
Per socket isn't ok either  maldain | 03/02/07
I don't belive it is quite that simple  JackPastor | 03/04/07
Imagine  Not average Joe | 03/02/07
Nothing new here, it has always been this way in the IBM Mainframe world.  piglet@... | 03/02/07
"I don't get the rationale for charging by the core for software."  Henry Miller | 03/02/07
Have you read Windows EULA?  devlin_X | 03/04/07
Depend on the definition  JackPastor | 03/04/07
Exactly  croberts | 04/10/08
... because there's no other real way to assess "value"  jigordon | 03/04/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline