On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 7 of 22:
Next »
« Previous
Not movies
First amendment violation for games has already been shown, as for movies. Every single law attempting to restrict distribution has been shot down by appeals or circuit courts.

Sales of movies are not restricted. If a minor wants to buy R rated movies, he is legally able to.
Posted by: rpmyers1   Posted on: 02/28/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

A better way to do this:  htotten | 02/28/05
No no no  GMTobias | 02/28/05
OTOH  Mack DaNife | 03/01/05
Waste of money  rpmyers1 | 02/28/05
No 1st ammendment violation!  ShadeTree | 02/28/05
agreed.  htotten | 02/28/05
Not movies  rpmyers1 | 02/28/05
The rights of a minor can be and are restricted.  ShadeTree | 03/01/05
But stigmatizing a media or content *is* censorship  rpmyers1 | 03/01/05
Censorship  Roger Ramjet | 03/01/05
*MAKE* it expensive?  rpmyers1 | 03/01/05
No kidding  voska | 03/01/05
It's easy to tell  rpmyers1 | 03/01/05
One problem with that  voska | 03/01/05
It's qualified  rpmyers1 | 03/01/05
Who cares if it is qualified...still means that big brother  Laff | 03/01/05
Loosen the tin foil Laff  rpmyers1 | 03/01/05
Re: Where did all the ANTI big government REPUBLICANS go?  Mack DaNife | 03/01/05
But stigmatizing a media or content *is* censorship  rpmyers1 | 03/01/05
Whoops. Mods, delete this and above  rpmyers1 | 03/01/05
Just more of a dangerious trend and it will get worse  Laff | 03/01/05
I never agreed...  Patrick Jones | 03/01/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here