On TV.com: 5 SCARIEST Episodes in TV History
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 22:
Next »
« Previous
No 1st ammendment violation!
It is already legel to restrict consumption by minors of ponography, cigarettes, booze, movies, etc. If they want to pass a law restricting the sale of certain games to minors it will pass the constitutional test!
Posted by: ShadeTree   Posted on: 02/28/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

A better way to do this:  htotten | 02/28/05
No no no  GMTobias | 02/28/05
OTOH  Mack DaNife | 03/01/05
Waste of money  rpmyers1 | 02/28/05
No 1st ammendment violation!  ShadeTree | 02/28/05
agreed.  htotten | 02/28/05
Not movies  rpmyers1 | 02/28/05
The rights of a minor can be and are restricted.  ShadeTree | 03/01/05
But stigmatizing a media or content *is* censorship  rpmyers1 | 03/01/05
Censorship  Roger Ramjet | 03/01/05
*MAKE* it expensive?  rpmyers1 | 03/01/05
No kidding  voska | 03/01/05
It's easy to tell  rpmyers1 | 03/01/05
One problem with that  voska | 03/01/05
It's qualified  rpmyers1 | 03/01/05
Who cares if it is qualified...still means that big brother  Laff | 03/01/05
Loosen the tin foil Laff  rpmyers1 | 03/01/05
Re: Where did all the ANTI big government REPUBLICANS go?  Mack DaNife | 03/01/05
But stigmatizing a media or content *is* censorship  rpmyers1 | 03/01/05
Whoops. Mods, delete this and above  rpmyers1 | 03/01/05
Just more of a dangerious trend and it will get worse  Laff | 03/01/05
I never agreed...  Patrick Jones | 03/01/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here