On BNET: Online porn struggles for profits
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 48:
Next »
« Previous
RE: Not so fast...
>In this case Think Secret is completely in the clear, Apple's sharks are just saber-rattling--and both sides know it.

>the only person here Apple can go after is the person who actually signed the NDA then broke it.

isn't one of the major things apple was looking for were the sources of the leaks? keep in mind that apple didn't wake and decide to file suit against think secret after a bad night of sleep. according to everything i've read, apple has been attempting to get that sort of information from think secret for a while now, but has been ignored. if think secret it soliciting trade secrets from people who they know (or likely assume) have signed nda's, they may hold some responsibility.
Posted by: JakAttak   Posted on: 01/05/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I can see both sides of this issue...First I love rumor  Laff | 01/05/05
I see myself getting the $500 iMAC  nucrash | 01/05/05
Sorry Dell  matson_z | 01/05/05
The problem with rumors  tic swayback | 01/05/05
How True... especially if just only a rumor...  LazLong | 01/05/05
I agree  dave95 | 01/05/05
Question..  Patrick Jones | 01/05/05
For the same reason.........  ShadeTree | 01/05/05
Not so fast...  wolf_z | 01/05/05
RE: Not so fast...  JakAttak | 01/05/05
Not true...  Physco Dude | 01/05/05
2 reasons  Physco Dude | 01/05/05
WHo broke the NDA?  Ken_z | 01/05/05
It's a catch22 for Apple  SUBE555 | 01/05/05
Apple tried and failed to do this under the radar...  Physco Dude | 01/05/05
I think this was very dumb...  BitTwiddler | 01/05/05
The media has responsiblities  Physco Dude | 01/05/05
Ever heard of the Pentagon Papers?  S.Howard-Sarin ZDNet Moderator | 01/05/05
What about the Novak example below?  tic swayback | 01/05/05
Novak's safe; Emmanuel Goldstein's not  S.Howard-Sarin ZDNet Moderator | 01/05/05
(NT) But hopefully they can nail Novak for perjury :o)  Jack-Booted EULA | 01/05/05
I would expect you to be correct except...  Physco Dude | 01/05/05
News vs. rumors  S.Howard-Sarin ZDNet Moderator | 01/05/05
I would use someone other then....  ShadeTree | 01/06/05
I may be wrong  PA-ITGuy | 01/05/05
Not really...  BitTwiddler | 01/06/05
Perfect, i was hoping a journalist would reply to this  Been_Done_Before | 01/06/05
IANAL  S.Howard-Sarin ZDNet Moderator | 01/06/05
Better tell that to Bob Novak.  Jack-Booted EULA | 01/05/05
They are not required....  BitTwiddler | 01/06/05
Cheaper than a new PowerBook...  slingzenarrowzuvowtrayjissforchin | 01/05/05
Apple has now...  Omch'Ar | 01/05/05
Apple is right. Besides; why defend a crook?  Physco Dude | 01/05/05
What law are you talking about?  voska | 01/05/05
All I know is...  Omch'Ar | 01/05/05
Bad comparison  PA-ITGuy | 01/05/05
Bad move  John L. Ries | 01/05/05
You don't buy a computer expecting a new fancy dust cover is coming...  chiishen | 01/05/05
OK!  dave95 | 01/05/05
Let's see....  chiishen | 01/05/05
The top secret of the industry ? iMac can be sold without the monitor. (NT)  Vily Clay | 01/06/05
Hey! He's right  j.m.galvin | 01/06/05
I've always said when people complained about  Laff | 01/06/05
The second top secret ? Mac MS Office is not alone. (NT)  Vily Clay | 01/06/05
Huh?  Laff | 01/06/05
What "new" products?  Feldwebel Wolfenstool | 01/10/05
Premature ejaculation  tic swayback | 01/10/05
what a crock  richdave | 01/16/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement