On CBS MoneyWatch: What Not to Buy at Walmart
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 33 of 48:
Next »
« Previous
Apple is right. Besides; why defend a crook?
Apple tried to do this fairly, in my opinion. They contacted "Stink Secrets (er Think Secrets) several times to remove the content and hand over the culprit. I?m not sure I would hand over someone to Apple; but ignoring Apple to remove content is wrong no matter what. Remember the person that passed secret information broke laws. If you want to protect someone who signs an agreement promising to keep your secrets, and then turns around and gives them out anyway; then I feel sorry for you.

The problem with your statement is you want to separate Apple from other corporation?s rights. You feel that Apple should be some sort of open, ?glass house?; not a company struggling to stay alive with extremely stiff competition. Remember the Microsoft's of the world are listening to every word coming out of Apple and other companies to get their chance to beat them to market with the next wiz-band product. This is a no-holds barred world we live in and any company would love to take down a competitor; Apple included.

I've said this before; but what if this wasn't Apple. What if this was McDonald-Douglas and what are leaked are trade secrets regarding our next military jet fighter (assuming you are from the USA)? What if it was secrets about making bombs? Would you want terrorists finding out how to build it? What about enemies? Apple has enemies as well. They usually don't start wars, but could be dangerous enough to put Apple out of business.

The law is not biased on this point. The law doesn?t care if the secret is protecting the country, military, Government or some mom and pop business. The law is the law.
Posted by: Physco Dude   Posted on: 01/05/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I can see both sides of this issue...First I love rumor  Laff | 01/05/05
I see myself getting the $500 iMAC  nucrash | 01/05/05
Sorry Dell  matson_z | 01/05/05
The problem with rumors  tic swayback | 01/05/05
How True... especially if just only a rumor...  LazLong | 01/05/05
I agree  dave95 | 01/05/05
Question..  Patrick Jones | 01/05/05
For the same reason.........  ShadeTree | 01/05/05
Not so fast...  wolf_z | 01/05/05
RE: Not so fast...  JakAttak | 01/05/05
Not true...  Physco Dude | 01/05/05
2 reasons  Physco Dude | 01/05/05
WHo broke the NDA?  Ken_z | 01/05/05
It's a catch22 for Apple  SUBE555 | 01/05/05
Apple tried and failed to do this under the radar...  Physco Dude | 01/05/05
I think this was very dumb...  BitTwiddler | 01/05/05
The media has responsiblities  Physco Dude | 01/05/05
Ever heard of the Pentagon Papers?  S.Howard-Sarin ZDNet Moderator | 01/05/05
What about the Novak example below?  tic swayback | 01/05/05
Novak's safe; Emmanuel Goldstein's not  S.Howard-Sarin ZDNet Moderator | 01/05/05
(NT) But hopefully they can nail Novak for perjury :o)  Jack-Booted EULA | 01/05/05
I would expect you to be correct except...  Physco Dude | 01/05/05
News vs. rumors  S.Howard-Sarin ZDNet Moderator | 01/05/05
I would use someone other then....  ShadeTree | 01/06/05
I may be wrong  PA-ITGuy | 01/05/05
Not really...  BitTwiddler | 01/06/05
Perfect, i was hoping a journalist would reply to this  Been_Done_Before | 01/06/05
IANAL  S.Howard-Sarin ZDNet Moderator | 01/06/05
Better tell that to Bob Novak.  Jack-Booted EULA | 01/05/05
They are not required....  BitTwiddler | 01/06/05
Cheaper than a new PowerBook...  slingzenarrowzuvowtrayjissforchin | 01/05/05
Apple has now...  Omch'Ar | 01/05/05
Apple is right. Besides; why defend a crook?  Physco Dude | 01/05/05
What law are you talking about?  voska | 01/05/05
All I know is...  Omch'Ar | 01/05/05
Bad comparison  PA-ITGuy | 01/05/05
Bad move  John L. Ries | 01/05/05
You don't buy a computer expecting a new fancy dust cover is coming...  chiishen | 01/05/05
OK!  dave95 | 01/05/05
Let's see....  chiishen | 01/05/05
The top secret of the industry ? iMac can be sold without the monitor. (NT)  Vily Clay | 01/06/05
Hey! He's right  j.m.galvin | 01/06/05
I've always said when people complained about  Laff | 01/06/05
The second top secret ? Mac MS Office is not alone. (NT)  Vily Clay | 01/06/05
Huh?  Laff | 01/06/05
What "new" products?  Feldwebel Wolfenstool | 01/10/05
Premature ejaculation  tic swayback | 01/10/05
what a crock  richdave | 01/16/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here