On BNET: Poll: Are You Greedy or a Do-Gooder?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 11:
Next »
« Previous
Interestingly enough
We have 10 XP machines and 4 OS X machines. The XP
machines require a sysadmin, the OS X machines don't. I say
fire both the sysadmin AND XP.

When they are side-by-side and you see how OS X clearly
outperforms XP, it boggles my mind to see why people still think
small businesses like ours should invest in Windows. I have lost
two complete days of productivity and now, possibly all the data
of one of the sales staff, someone that used to work for Michael
Dell, by the way.

BTW, if he reported to me, he would be gone. If I ran the IT
budget, Windows would be banned. I am currently pushing to
try using Novell's Desktop Linux.

And we wouldn't need a sysadmin. The users could do it all
themselves. Hell, we wouldn't even need that stupid W2K server
that I have to reboot at least once per week and that suddenly
stopped sharing the HP printer to the Macs. F*****g crap that
server. If we were all Mac, we wouldn't need a server at all.
Posted by: mlindl   Posted on: 11/22/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Rats from a sinking ship?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/22/04
Who cares?  mlindl | 11/22/04
My advice, fire your admin...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/22/04
Not a bash  mlindl | 11/22/04
Then firing him should be your first order of business.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/22/04
Interestingly enough  mlindl | 11/22/04
I've always been amused that PC's need another  Laff | 11/23/04
You're easily amused...  RocketEater | 11/23/04
Trust ZDnet to back spin this one  Len Rooney | 11/22/04
Two leae Apple  UncaBill | 11/22/04
"No ax to grind" is a fraud  YuridaMan | 11/23/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement