On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 15 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
The next question is,
How much will Static sue IBM, opps, I mean LexMark for because of the losses and expenses caused by this frivilous suit.
Posted by: James Dean_z   Posted on: 10/27/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

It's still a bad law.  mobrien_12@... | 10/26/04
Let's all cheer for common sense  Fred Fredrickson | 10/26/04
Actually  Letophoro | 10/26/04
of course  V Sanders | 10/27/04
media companies want to buy NEW laws  V Sanders | 10/26/04
The problem with common sense...  ibabadur1 | 10/27/04
Now it's called "RARE SENSE"  Spoon Jabber | 10/27/04
Lexmark = Slimebags  shawkins | 10/26/04
same here  V Sanders | 10/26/04
Indeed  James T. Kirk | 10/27/04
The judgement.  Letophoro | 10/26/04
if this is upheld  V Sanders | 10/26/04
In 1998 you'd have been called insane.  James T. Kirk | 10/27/04
Some good sense - at least  rohn_z | 10/27/04
The next question is,  James Dean_z | 10/27/04
I believe that IBM no longer owns Lexmark ...  George Mitchell | 10/27/04
IBM spun off Lexmark years ago!  drichards1953 | 10/27/04
you nailed it  V Sanders | 10/28/04
Wishful thinking?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 10/28/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline