Ruling on refilled printer cartridges touches DMCA

In 1998 you'd have been called insane.: When this travesty was passed into law, I seem to recall all the RIAA shills...er I mean, all the politicians, assuring the public that the DMCA would never be used in the manner that Lexmark is now using it.; Posted by: James T. Kirk Posted on: 10/27/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Reply to Story Reply to Message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

It's still a bad law. mobrien_12@... | 10/26/04

Let's all cheer for common sense Fred Fredrickson | 10/26/04

Actually Letophoro | 10/26/04

of course V Sanders | 10/27/04

Now it's called "RARE SENSE" Spoon Jabber | 10/27/04

Lexmark = Slimebags shawkins | 10/26/04

same here V Sanders | 10/26/04

Indeed James T. Kirk | 10/27/04

The judgement. Letophoro | 10/26/04

if this is upheld V Sanders | 10/26/04

The next question is, James Dean_z | 10/27/04

you nailed it V Sanders | 10/28/04

Wishful thinking? Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 10/28/04

What do you think?

Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
Produced by
ZDNet and