On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
Indeed
I would go back to using a typewriter before I would buy any Lexmark product. Their actions are reprehensible.

Amen. And where I work Lexmark is not even considered for purchase any longer, not as long as I have anything to say about it. And it just so happens that I do.

True, we only have a few hundred printers, so it's not like we're going to bring down Lexmark by doing so, but they'll not get another dime from me.
Posted by: James T. Kirk   Posted on: 10/27/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

It's still a bad law.  mobrien_12@... | 10/26/04
Let's all cheer for common sense  Fred Fredrickson | 10/26/04
Actually  Letophoro | 10/26/04
of course  V Sanders | 10/27/04
media companies want to buy NEW laws  V Sanders | 10/26/04
The problem with common sense...  ibabadur1 | 10/27/04
Now it's called "RARE SENSE"  Spoon Jabber | 10/27/04
Lexmark = Slimebags  shawkins | 10/26/04
same here  V Sanders | 10/26/04
Indeed  James T. Kirk | 10/27/04
The judgement.  Letophoro | 10/26/04
if this is upheld  V Sanders | 10/26/04
In 1998 you'd have been called insane.  James T. Kirk | 10/27/04
Some good sense - at least  rohn_z | 10/27/04
The next question is,  James Dean_z | 10/27/04
I believe that IBM no longer owns Lexmark ...  George Mitchell | 10/27/04
IBM spun off Lexmark years ago!  drichards1953 | 10/27/04
you nailed it  V Sanders | 10/28/04
Wishful thinking?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 10/28/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors