It's still a bad law.
mobrien_12@... | 10/26/04
|
Let's all cheer for common sense
Fred Fredrickson | 10/26/04
|

Actually
Letophoro | 10/26/04
|
 
of course
V Sanders | 10/27/04
|

media companies want to buy NEW laws
V Sanders | 10/26/04
|

The problem with common sense...
ibabadur1 | 10/27/04
|
 
Now it's called "RARE SENSE"
Spoon Jabber | 10/27/04
|
Lexmark = Slimebags
shawkins | 10/26/04
|

same here
V Sanders | 10/26/04
|

Indeed
James T. Kirk | 10/27/04
|
The judgement.
Letophoro | 10/26/04
|
if this is upheld
V Sanders | 10/26/04
|

In 1998 you'd have been called insane.
James T. Kirk | 10/27/04
|
Some good sense - at least
rohn_z | 10/27/04
|
The next question is,
James Dean_z | 10/27/04
|

I believe that IBM no longer owns Lexmark ...
George Mitchell | 10/27/04
|

IBM spun off Lexmark years ago!
drichards1953 | 10/27/04
|
 
you nailed it
V Sanders | 10/28/04
|
Wishful thinking?
Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 10/28/04
|