On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 9:
Next »
« Previous
Kodak isn't well known with digicam quality...
A bit of a shame; I recall talking to people about why Kodak was getting lax with film quality and was told they were working more on digicam quality.

Oops.

I've tried some of Kodak's ultrazoom and other cameras, and they are not worth the price. sad
Posted by: HypnoToad72   Posted on: 02/06/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I upgraded KODAK cameras and found lower quality  racingmustang | 02/06/07
Kodak isn't well known with digicam quality...  HypnoToad72 | 02/06/07
yea, i bought a 3.2 cheapy to replace my sony 2mp  Been_Done_Before | 02/06/07
Fiction.  HypnoToad72 | 02/06/07
Optics are more important than the sensor  tic swayback | 02/06/07
Comparison....  JCitizen | 02/06/07
The tale of two cameras  Hot Face | 02/06/07
Low LIight is not the end of it  amitbat | 02/07/07
Thought so...  Shadetree Engineer | 02/07/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More