On MovieTome: Concept art of Iron Man's super-villain!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 42 of 154:
Next »
« Previous
now that is a rant
Umm hate to tell you this, but Apple Inc? is a hardware company. They made OS X not (O$X) to sell hardware. Next!


Is this why they offer software suites that run on O$ X(excuse me). You are saying the "i" suite of apps, dev tools et al are designed only to sell hardware? I don't buy it. Next.



The iPod doesn't support .wma or .wmv files as the license required by
Microsoft would prohibit Apple from selling "fairplay" tracks. So Microsoft is the onerous one here. Next!



first, it's nice to hear you admit $teve Job$ and crew do use onerous licensing, evidenced by your usage of the word "here" in this statement. But there is nothing keeping apple from allowing wmv files to be "played" on an iPod, is there? Apple chose, for financial reasons, to NOT ALLOW playback of .wmv, .wma (not originating from MTV URGE et al) because they are greedy and corrupt. There are people with tons of wmp files. Apple is the ONEROUS one here.. next



The intel Macs can natively load windows, the real question is why? Being that windows is not as good as OS X (and cost twice as much). The real question is why would anyone want to use it on Apple hardware? The only answer I could think of
is for Microsoft to further abuse it's monopoly position. Next!



WRong again. Windows is not as good as O$ X. hmmm...facts? The facts are you CAN buy a complete Windows OS to run on any hardware of your choosing. Apple only sells upgrades (patches) for 129.00 a pop. Nobody, including your arrogant A$$ really knows how much of the cost of a Mac is O$ X. There is no way to know without internal apple accounting documents.

Monopoly position. hmmm...here we go again. The abuse monopoly power by marketshare, but O$ X is more secure and marketshare is a "myth". You are so deluded it's not funny. I've said before many times, an apple zealot will tell you marketshare has NOTHING to do with security, but at the same time it can turn humans into zombies chanting "no choice". What a load of crap. next


You just have to love the windows zealot's favorite rant. It's ok when Microsoft
charges $199 for a service pack (windows xp is NT 5.1 and windows 2k was NT 5). Yet when Apple replaces the Kernel and adds more applications, they (Apple) should give it away for free? What's Microsoft's next service pack going to cost? I
believe it's anywhere from $159 to $329. Next!



what a joke. So MS has not had a new OS since win95. Ok, whatever you want to believe. Changing to a new platform on your powerpc users is the thing to do. Then steal/borrow the entire engine using BSD. (developed originally by darpa with taxpayer dollars making O$ X just another federal goverment project, paid for by taxpayers like me...you I doubt...with a stolen gui slapped on it. Apple has never innovated nor written their own code for any substantial piece of their system. $teve Job$ is good, I'll give you that. Good at stealing other ideas, like synaptics, PARC, BSD etc etc and branding it Apple. wheee.
Yeah Rick, they rewrite jack squat. next


The windows zealot's favorite rant. "Apple products are too expensive!", "My job at
burger hut won't support me buying their stuff". Boo hoo, Do you whine that you
can't afford a better car, house, TV, etc.? Last time I checked the Zune cost as much as a similar iPod? and get this, it is even more restrictive! So your little Anti Apple/ Pro Microsoft rant is nothing more than that. Maybe you should be
attending your NBM meeting and getting better rants from the senior members?



Sorry Rick. I'm not a zealot like you. I don't make light of other's financial situations, or pretend I know what it may be. There's nothing really to say here exept these statements show you are zealot and arrogant. next



Maybe next time you should try to reply with more objectivity. But then again, the monopoly power to turn humans into zombies thing...i forget...sorry.
Posted by: xuniL_z   Posted on: 01/12/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Not known for interoperability? Gimme a break!  Fred Fredrickson | 01/12/07
iTtunes/DRM ? OS X in a VM?  john.murray@... | 01/12/07
iTunes interoperates with Windows.  nomorems | 01/12/07
That analogy is so oiverused and stupid  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
You're kidding, right?  MacGeek2121 | 01/15/07
As a matter of fact  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Read again silly.  nomorems | 01/12/07
Money Grubbing Crook?  MacGeek2121 | 01/15/07
Car analogies  wcb42ad | 01/12/07
this is too familiar, NZ...is that you in cognito?  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Nope  wcb42ad | 01/12/07
true  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Porsche 914  slopoke | 01/12/07
OS X on a OEM PC. Same thing.  nomorems | 01/12/07
iTunes works very well on PC  Spoon Jabber | 01/12/07
Cisco's side of the "interoperability" debate  schlice | 01/12/07
It's not about interoperability  MacGeek2121 | 01/15/07
How can you say that...  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Oh yeah, btw  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
more than one iTunes  Mr_Dave | 01/12/07
I said I don't use the iTunes store, just...  Spoon Jabber | 01/12/07
actually  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Quicktime  Spoon Jabber | 01/12/07
iTunes + Quicktime  Mr_Dave | 01/12/07
Look in  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Re: Look in  Mr_Dave | 01/12/07
XUNIL_Z is either a liar  mlindl | 01/12/07
No, it's the other one  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
swapping libraries  Mr_Dave | 01/12/07
That sounds great.  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Sorry...  cashaww | 01/13/07
Well, for starters  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Call it what it is...  Rick_K | 01/12/07
OK  wcb42ad | 01/12/07
You really are clueless.  Rick_K | 01/12/07
hmmmm  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Free OS for evah! WOOT!  wcb42ad | 01/16/07
iToilet? iPaper?  Arm A. Geddon | 01/12/07
Of course they do.  wcb42ad | 01/16/07
Here is what I find interesting...  cashaww | 01/13/07
Actually  wcb42ad | 01/16/07
now that is a rant  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Windows vs. OSX versions  lonniemcclure | 01/12/07
re: dual standards  Arm A. Geddon | 01/12/07
I've got to remember to  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Actually no  Rick_K | 01/12/07
If you think that's bad  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Read it again.  Rick_K | 01/12/07
Ok, I read it again.  xuniL_z | 01/13/07
Bias should be a matter of choice and personal opinion  MacGeek2121 | 01/15/07
Speaking of Rants...  Rick_K | 01/12/07
Thanks for your permission  xuniL_z | 01/13/07
Inerop is a problem  net-com | 01/12/07
What other device?  mlindl | 01/12/07
Amazing that you can stick that all in your mouth!  DCMann | 01/12/07
And what other devices can you play  Rick_K | 01/12/07
CISCO wants to sell iPHONES,  coffee junky | 01/13/07
Get a clue, fanboy  ChazzMatt | 01/12/07
Like that will ever happen...sheeeezzzzz  Laff | 01/12/07
This begs the question, when will apple target men?  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Heavy duty metal iPod covers GRRRR!!!  Spoon Jabber | 01/12/07
Didn't you forget to mention gays, too?  mlindl | 01/12/07
Message has been deleted.  Spoon Jabber | 01/12/07
you sir, are a jerk.  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Hey if Apple attracts the ladies I'm IN!!!!!  Laff | 01/12/07
Well jim, in your case  xuniL_z | 01/13/07
LOL!  Spoon Jabber | 01/14/07
Not known for interoperability  BRedmond@... | 01/12/07
Qualified interoperability  M.R. Kennedy | 01/12/07
You miss the point...  readwryt@... | 01/12/07
Re: Gimme a break!  Antoshik81 | 01/14/07
How Apple could fight Cisco  Loverock Davidson | 01/12/07
Apple likes to fight? Or she'sa scrapper?  Laff | 01/12/07
Fighting  Loverock Davidson | 01/12/07
WWF wrestling fighting  Zeppo9191 | 01/12/07
Shattered my dreams!  Spoon Jabber | 01/12/07
Bite your tongues!  fuzzy2k | 01/12/07
wwf? it's now the wwe. (nt)  Arm A. Geddon | 01/12/07
I resemble that remark!  Spoon Jabber | 01/12/07
In here lies  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Why they would want to  tic swayback | 01/12/07
Let the Babies Fight it Out  jpr75_z | 01/12/07
I agree  usrhlp | 01/12/07
iWhatever  numbers987654321 | 01/12/07
You've gotta be kidding  Geek the Gray | 01/12/07
Read the article, again.  Rick_K | 01/12/07
Who owns it?  justanitguy | 01/12/07
iWhatever  digitnsm | 01/14/07
Is it going to put a buck in my pocket?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/12/07
If you own Apple or Cisco stock it might (NT)  Spoon Jabber | 01/12/07
does posting to this article put a buck in your pocket?  B.O.F.H. | 01/12/07
As a matter of fact...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/12/07
(NT) Jah we pretty much figured that..... :o)  Jack-Booted EULA | 01/12/07
So you are paid to troll ZDNet talkbacks?  B.O.F.H. | 01/12/07
It's OK for Apple to sue a company  John Zern | 01/12/07
John, you can drop the "ing"  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Maybe that'll be their undoing  Boot_Agnostic | 01/12/07
Introducing the All New MacPhone  NotATreoFan | 01/12/07
Could be confusing...  Spoon Jabber | 01/12/07
It won't work... Apple is evolving  Tigertank | 01/12/07
Put a camera and a PDA on it  LadyGray | 01/12/07
Why not the Apple Phone  nucrash | 01/12/07
re: Apple Phone  Arm A. Geddon | 01/12/07
sweet  digitnsm | 01/14/07
The McDonalds defense?  osreinstall | 01/12/07
Burgers and airplanes  M.R. Kennedy | 01/12/07
I hate to say this  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Thanks for the spell check, kind of.  osreinstall | 01/12/07
One's a company name, the other a product  John Zern | 01/12/07
They are both company names.  osreinstall | 01/12/07
Is this guy for real?  lenohere | 01/12/07
So... I can create a backpack, call it an IPod and get away with that?  skipperjohn | 01/12/07
Trademark life  M.R. Kennedy | 01/12/07
Apple probably losing in the end  cbsimkins@... | 01/12/07
Cisco should give up iPhone TM for $$$  DickCaro | 01/12/07
You miss the point  Geek the Gray | 01/12/07
Strong association or not  Boot_Agnostic | 01/12/07
Translated - How Apple can run the price of a license up.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/12/07
Or....  tic swayback | 01/12/07
You mean  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Smart is as smart does  tic swayback | 01/12/07
It's funny  xuniL_z | 01/12/07
Feed the children... Not Jobs children.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/12/07
Could be, Jobs is known for screwing people and  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/12/07
So apparently Jobs is heterosexual.  B.O.F.H. | 01/12/07
Has nothing to do with claiming his OWN CHILD.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/12/07
So he left you after you got pregnant?  B.O.F.H. | 01/12/07
Why Would APPLE fight CISCO?  dcsloan128@... | 01/12/07
Grip will never happen  lenohere | 01/12/07
New name for the iphone  JimNecci | 01/12/07
Or maybe ...  mwagner@... | 01/12/07
Sounds like a pissing match to me ....  mwagner@... | 01/12/07
Tied up in litigation for years  FallGuy7254 | 01/12/07
$10!!!!!  justanitguy | 01/12/07
Plane vs faucet  perryroyce@... | 01/12/07
The Apple iPhone "rumour" has been  mlindl | 01/12/07
Couple of Problems  perryroyce@... | 01/12/07
Learn how the law works  Geek the Gray | 01/12/07
Huh?  perryroyce@... | 01/12/07
Sorry  perryroyce@... | 01/12/07
Us? We?  justanitguy | 01/12/07
The phone formally known as iPhone.  Markcusio | 01/12/07
APPLE iPHONE  vk4cma@... | 01/12/07
Sorry, John.  Geek the Gray | 01/12/07
iPod Phone  woja | 01/12/07
Rename iPhone to  jsulcer@... | 01/12/07
PodPhone  zd@... | 01/17/07
Failure to defend  lonniemcclure | 01/12/07
Rediculous analogy  slylabs13 | 01/15/07
The iPone(Pod+Phone), iFone, iCall...  nielsenbj@... | 01/15/07
Apple should pay for the press  mighetto | 01/16/07
Wonder if the challenge could be boon for other companies  Boot_Agnostic | 01/16/07
Don't bring an Apple to a Gunfight!  theciscokid | 01/16/07
Negotiation Backfire  Nemo1 | 01/22/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here