On TV.com: 11 Things U Don't Know About JOSS WHEDON
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 18 of 18:
« Previous
Not entirely true
1. Cacheing offsets much of the problem and cache hits are pretty high percentage.

2. Transfer rates tend to increase as drives get bigger. Why? more sectors per track (as well as more tracks per platter) More sectors passing under the head at a given RPM boosts the transfer rate.

3. Vertical recording makes #2 even more true

But on the issue of access time(time to get the heads aligned), you are right, better to have more drives.
Posted by: DevGuy_z   Posted on: 04/27/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Compatability?  yyuko@... | 04/25/06
It's still not solid-state.  Mr. Roboto | 04/25/06
and...  doh123 | 04/25/06
Not as reliable  Yensi717 | 04/26/06
Already been done  wizard_of_oz | 04/28/06
Reliability?!  johnsmith222 | 04/25/06
Overkill?  HypnoToad72 | 04/25/06
Re: Overkill? -- Seriously?  AeroPreacher | 04/25/06
Re: Overkill?  yyuko@... | 04/26/06
Uses  ArthurDent | 04/26/06
Sure the warez guys are salavating.  Been_Done_Before | 04/26/06
AND... Mine's bigger than yours!  DevGuy_z | 04/27/06
About the only use I can see for a home user  Linux User 147560 | 04/25/06
For those of us  Sabz5150 | 04/25/06
The problem with hard drives  Roger Ramjet | 04/26/06
Platters  Troll Hunter | 04/26/06
IDE can remap sectors  DevGuy_z | 04/26/06
Not entirely true  DevGuy_z | 04/27/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here