No doubt about it, massive storage is required.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/28/06
|

Yeah, it is required
Michael Kelly | 02/28/06
|
 
I figure I'll 6.4 TB
voska | 02/28/06
|

Seriously though
Michael Kelly | 02/28/06
|
 
A big IF
voska | 02/28/06
|
  
Not sure
Michael Kelly | 02/28/06
|
   
Not an issue
voska | 03/01/06
|
 
Drive Size vs Arrays
Wolfie2K3 | 02/28/06
|
Wotts to stop us
s_gamgee | 02/28/06
|
No, they've been selling a 64-bit version of Windows for around 4 years.
PB_z | 02/28/06
|
RAID, HERE I COME!!
CobraA1 | 02/28/06
|
$400/TB
baldwinleo@... | 02/28/06
|
Hard Drives vs. Trees
ZStoner | 02/28/06
|
So maybe SCSI isn't dead?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/28/06
|

Nope.. Tis dead. Stick a fork in it.
Wolfie2K3 | 02/28/06
|

Nope it isn't
voska | 03/01/06
|
Windows Vista is Bloated and Full of Swiss Cheese Holes
Evisscerator | 02/28/06
|

YET another Linux fanboi heard from... (NT)
Wolfie2K3 | 02/28/06
|
 
Give it time
m-nature | 03/01/06
|
Cool, but... failure rate with several disks is...
MV_z | 02/28/06
|

Ermmm. No
nucrash | 02/28/06
|
 
But then you'd not have 8 TB
voska | 03/01/06
|

Sort of
voska | 03/01/06
|
Scarily big...
zkiwi | 02/28/06
|
Old rule of thumb : data will expand to fill all available storage.
JonathonDoe | 03/01/06
|
8 TB's on Windows?
LocoMojo | 03/01/06
|
How about 8 Picobytes?
metilley@... | 03/01/06
|

Umm.. 8 Picobytes is a very small amount
mombo | 03/01/06
|
 
SIZE
SC-man | 03/01/06
|
RE: Coming soon: The 8-terabyte desktop
COMMANDOF4 | 06/23/09
|
RE: Coming soon: The 8-terabyte desktop
COMMANDOF4 | 06/23/09
|