No doubt about it, massive storage is required.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/28/06
|
Yeah, it is required
Michael Kelly | 02/28/06
|
I figure I'll 6.4 TB
voska | 02/28/06
|
|
Seriously though
Michael Kelly | 02/28/06
|
A big IF
voska | 02/28/06
|
|
Not sure
Michael Kelly | 02/28/06
|
|
Not an issue
voska | 03/01/06
|
|
Drive Size vs Arrays
Wolfie2K3 | 02/28/06
|
|
Wotts to stop us
s_gamgee | 02/28/06
|
|
No, they've been selling a 64-bit version of Windows for around 4 years.
PB_z | 02/28/06
|
|
RAID, HERE I COME!!
CobraA1 | 02/28/06
|
|
$400/TB
baldwinleo@... | 02/28/06
|
|
Hard Drives vs. Trees
ZStoner | 02/28/06
|
|
So maybe SCSI isn't dead?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/28/06
|
|
Nope.. Tis dead. Stick a fork in it.
Wolfie2K3 | 02/28/06
|
|
Nope it isn't
voska | 03/01/06
|
|
Windows Vista is Bloated and Full of Swiss Cheese Holes
Evisscerator | 02/28/06
|
|
YET another Linux fanboi heard from... (NT)
Wolfie2K3 | 02/28/06
|
|
Give it time
m-nature | 03/01/06
|
|
Cool, but... failure rate with several disks is...
MV_z | 02/28/06
|
|
Ermmm. No
nucrash | 02/28/06
|
|
But then you'd not have 8 TB
voska | 03/01/06
|
|
Sort of
voska | 03/01/06
|
|
Scarily big...
zkiwi | 02/28/06
|
|
Old rule of thumb : data will expand to fill all available storage.
JonathonDoe | 03/01/06
|
|
8 TB's on Windows?
LocoMojo | 03/01/06
|
|
How about 8 Picobytes?
metilley@... | 03/01/06
|
|
Umm.. 8 Picobytes is a very small amount
mombo | 03/01/06
|
|
SIZE
SC-man | 03/01/06
|
|
RE: Coming soon: The 8-terabyte desktop
COMMANDOF4 | 06/23/09
|
|
RE: Coming soon: The 8-terabyte desktop
COMMANDOF4 | 06/23/09
|
A simplified IT environment isn't just less complex. It's also more reliable. Standardize on a single Linux platform with SUSE Linux Enterprise from Novell, and get the world's most interoperable Linux
Doc delivers the scoop on today's enterprise content management, printer maintenance, and all other issues related to document management. It's the DocuMentor Blog.
