On CBS MoneyWatch: Stop listening to Jim Cramer
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 46 of 76:
Next »
« Previous
So much nothing chat about a license to use Copyrighted works.
The whole point to the GPL is that it is a license to use other peoples Copyrighted works. Under Intellectual Property Law, you need a license to use any IP (Copyright, Trademark, Patent) that belongs to another party. Every source/Copyright license (GPL, BSD, CDL, etc.) sets restrictions that the author of the work feels protects their own rights to benefit from said works. The people who rant against one license or another (you know who you are) are all in some way unethical and probubly infringers or clueless about Intellectual Property laws and what they mean (though one could discuss the merits of one developer license versus another). No license means that you are an infringer of other people rights (since you have no granted rights from those that own the intellectal property in question). Amazing why this is so hard for some people.

Granted, the GPL does take a stand against DRM, though this has more to do with what the GPL is designed for (developers, not generic end users like those who get a TiVo or some random device). DRM can be handles either via an application (Real Player, Quicktime Player, Windows Media Player, some document/word processing application, etc.) so it does not have to be working with any chip level DRM/Trusted Computing hardware.
Posted by: B.O.F.H.   Posted on: 01/19/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

New Linux license takes aim at DRM and Hollywood  Loverock Davidson | 01/18/06
Rockhead, "tongue in cheek" is NOT the same ...  Judas I. | 01/18/06
You realize of course that...  #_z | 01/18/06
Linus will just use the existing GPL...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/18/06
Liar! Oh...the "L" word. Or wait...that's "Loverock"!  techboy_z | 01/18/06
Why the insults? Can think of a real comment?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/18/06
You realize....  Shelendrea | 01/18/06
Isn't that sad???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/19/06
In order to be worthy of a REAL comment ...  Judas I. | 01/19/06
He is what he is.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/19/06
true  Shelendrea | 01/19/06
Oh, now THAT'S rich.  Judas I. | 01/19/06
Knock it off  Shelendrea | 01/19/06
You must be new around here.  Judas I. | 01/19/06
Oh this is getting good  Shelendrea | 01/19/06
Yep, gittin' really good, we're makin' progress, Shelendrea.  Judas I. | 01/19/06
Trouble is, DRM has good uses  A.Sinic | 01/20/06
Good uses?  jgoecks@... | 01/20/06
No, Linus said that...  Tony Agudo | 01/18/06
An odd statement.  Anton Philidor | 01/18/06
RE:  Edward Meyers | 01/18/06
Also tricky.  Anton Philidor | 01/18/06
A Good Chunk  Edward Meyers | 01/18/06
It Apears to be Aimed More At  Edward Meyers | 01/18/06
Another 10 year block of our lives...  John Le'Brecage | 01/19/06
DRM in the studio...  A.Sinic | 01/20/06
Funny how none of those security measures  mustangj36@... | 01/21/06
DRM and GPL3  hipparchus2001 | 01/18/06
Then it wouldn't be DRM anymore  Tony Agudo | 01/18/06
remote DRM?  __howard__ | 01/18/06
Does Hollywood have to abandon Linux...  Anton Philidor | 01/18/06
Mr Stallman v. Mr Gates/Ballmer  mdsmedia | 01/19/06
DRM (actually TPM) and GPL3  krehbiel | 01/19/06
Malware Writters Will Just Sign The Code  Edward Meyers | 01/19/06
Malware Writters Can't Just Sign The Code  krehbiel | 01/19/06
Oh well, knew it was coming  Boot_Agnostic | 01/19/06
This article is 100% FUD  krehbiel | 01/19/06
And that's why DRM doesn't work  voska | 01/19/06
Big win for Microsoft CE and sad day for PMPs  wa1gon | 01/19/06
TiVo USES Linux  Roger Ramjet | 01/19/06
Change to Windows I suppose.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/19/06
If it came down to it  Loverock Davidson | 01/19/06
linux reference is more than kernel.. bigger than Tivo  john.gruber@... | 01/19/06
Hmm...  thetargos | 01/19/06
Bad headline  John L. Ries | 01/19/06
So much nothing chat about a license to use Copyrighted works.  B.O.F.H. | 01/19/06
So I pose a serious question. When does it end?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/19/06
A License is a contract, a copyright is different  Physco Dude | 01/19/06
I am presuming that you are versed in Copyright Law by now.  B.O.F.H. | 01/19/06
DMCA and DRM Question?  alricsca | 01/19/06
GPL or any future version...  krehbiel | 01/19/06
DRM is NOT A BAD THING!  RMD | 01/19/06
You must be new to DRM to say that  Tony Agudo | 01/19/06
Yes!  TimeBomb | 01/19/06
Thanks!  Tony Agudo | 01/20/06
GREAT post Rafterman wink  btljooz | 01/20/06
I'm not a Windows user but...  Tony Agudo | 01/21/06
You have a point, but...  Physco Dude | 01/19/06
Sell what? The song is not the product, a ticket to a show is a product!!!  xunil skcor | 01/19/06
huh?????  Shelendrea | 01/19/06
Legally, you're probably not "buying" the song  __howard__ | 01/19/06
Your not buying the song or any "license" either.  xunil skcor | 01/20/06
Nor give it away ...  __howard__ | 01/24/06
so.............  Shelendrea | 01/19/06
iTunes  TimeBomb | 01/19/06
It really isn't a bad thing. Just FUD on overtime.  osreinstall | 01/21/06
People! GPL software does not mean you have to run GPL sofwatre on it....  Physco Dude | 01/19/06
GO Stallman!!! This is great news for open software!!!  xunil skcor | 01/19/06
Obutterball  Shelendrea | 01/19/06
Perfect sense to me, Shelendrea.  Judas I. | 01/19/06
Uncle Uncle!  Shelendrea | 01/19/06
Just ignore DRM  Mectron | 01/20/06
DRM is not just for Movies and Music  A.Sinic | 01/20/06
RE: DRM is not just for Movies and Music by A.Sinic  btljooz | 01/20/06
RE: Just ignore DRM by Mectron  btljooz | 01/20/06
GOOD!!!!  btljooz | 01/20/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement