On CHOW: Throw parties like a pro
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 18:
Next »
« Previous
Did they actualy buy Spyglass?.
Did they buy them, or just license the technology, and as I recall
(correct me if I'm wrong), it worked out horribly for Spyglass, as
it was based on a percentage of revenue from selling copies of
IE, which was, of course, given away for free.

And shouldn't they have bought Mosaic, at least if they're as
virtuous as the parent poster suggests? After all, Mosaic was
there first, and MS would of course be happy to pay off the real
inventor of the technology, and not just buy some second rate
imitator. Right?
Posted by: tic swayback   Posted on: 01/10/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Well, that's iLife!  mlindl | 01/09/06
Agree  Boot_Agnostic | 01/10/06
Apple is a Predator too...  jpr75_z | 01/10/06
Apple had web publishing tools years ago  j.m.galvin | 01/10/06
MICROSOFT IS EVIL!!!  NonZealot | 01/10/06
Best do more research before ranting  tic swayback | 01/10/06
But didn't Micrsooft buy spyglass?  voska | 01/10/06
Did they actualy buy Spyglass?.  tic swayback | 01/10/06
Virtuous?  NonZealot | 01/10/06
No religion here  tic swayback | 01/10/06
Tic...  nomorems | 01/10/06
You'd think that would have been great  voska | 01/10/06
Here's the details  tic swayback | 01/10/06
I took your challenge  NonZealot | 01/10/06
Apple is still looking for the real killer  tic swayback | 01/10/06
Good example of innovation  voska | 01/10/06
Correction  tic swayback | 01/10/06
Where is the MacExpo news?  Loverock Davidson | 01/10/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here