On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 38 of 189:
Next »
« Previous
Got any more magical fairy tales you'd like to tell us?
---YES because you own the MEDIUM! You own the canvas, the frame, the whatever. You cannot, however, then proceed to take pictures of your painting and go sell that!---

Which means I own the content, but not the copyright. If you steal a Rembrandt from my house, will you be charged with grand theft for a very valuable painting, or petty larceny for a $20 canvas and some paint? Will my insurance company reimburse me for the full value of the work I own, or just $20 for the "medium"?

Let me put it this way. I buy a book, I own that copy, that physical instance of that ink in those shapes that forms that content. If I buy a painting, I own that physical instance of paint and canvas that makes that image, in other words, that content. If I buy a cd, I own that set of 1's and 0's that makes that sound come out of my speakers. That content.

---And if all your scholary work does is exactly quote the original source, that would be ILLEGAL! You can of course quote and reference source material, but you cannot reproduce it verbatim.---

Never said that was all my scholarly work would contain, but I can reproduce large quantities of it verbatim. Unlike what you claimed earlier.

---Sure, if you skip the next sentence that comes after it. Once again, the exception to the reproduction came AFTER the original copyright law was introduced!---

Let's see, the next sentence was:
"So technically, you've violated copyright laws just for making a backup copy of that CD you bought, although this is a gray area since it also falls under the "personal use" category."

How have I "violated copyright laws just for making a backup copy" when I've reproduced the work in a scholarly work? Your absolutist claim was there to try to reinforce your flawed point. You were talking about one particular instance of reproduction, so stating that "You aren't even allowed to reproduce it!" is blatantly wrong, because as you now admit, you are allowed to reproduce it.

---Still not reading your own sources eh? =P---

What part of my saying, "just as you are restricted from removing the catalytic converter from your car" made you think that I was referring to race cars that are not driven on the street. Still, you make a good point, as, just like copyright laws state, there are many exceptions that allow reproduction of a work.

---There is also no law that explicitly states that you can---

Ah. I see. There is no law that explicitly states that I'm allowed to breathe. Am I going to be jailed for breathing now? Do you live in America? Generally, the way things work around here, is that it's legal to do things even when there's "no law that explicitly states that you can."

---You can fast-forward which falls under "time-shift" but you will not see a single DVR device that wholly skips commercials. Which is technically possible since commercials are identifiable with a signal flag built into the broadcast but not legally allowed.---

It is completely legally allowed. Again, you're telling fairy tales and making up laws. Find that law for me, I dare you. I double dog dare you. DVR companies have caved to pressure from the MPAA and are doing this voluntarily, not under compulsion from any law. Stop lying.

---Ummm...your own article states that legal precedent does not exist. Need I quote from the EFF site again?---

Funny, why don't you quote the part where they cite precedent from Betamax and Grokster?

---Sorry buddy. Just because the facts don't agree with you don't mean that they aren't true. Your own references support my argument!---

Really? Which one of my references says it's illegal to skip commercials?
Posted by: tic swayback   Posted on: 01/05/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

It's not made in US  ChinesePhDinCA | 01/04/06
you mean that only the defects are made domestically  michael_t | 01/05/06
You should check your facts.(nt)  IT Scion | 01/05/06
Too little, too late (YAWN)  theMacDaddy | 01/04/06
better late than never  MIS Master | 01/05/06
That is SO funny...  BitTwiddler | 01/05/06
I'd like to know what you mean by....  Laff | 01/05/06
I think he means....  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Gotta LOVE those little extras!!! heh heh heh  Laff | 01/05/06
Are you high or just stupid?  999ad@... | 01/05/06
Another Clueless MS Shill  nomorems | 01/05/06
Which tape format is better Beta or VHS?  George Jay | 01/05/06
I don't think it was marketing  voska | 01/05/06
Yep  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Well... Kinda Yep  OliverSeal | 01/05/06
There's the rub  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Observations from watching the webcast (long read) happy  myxner | 01/05/06
Thanks for the report  jrbeaman | 01/05/06
Nice double standards  sedzdnet | 01/06/06
What about all the great new DRM features?!?  xunil skcor | 01/05/06
Quiet, no one is suppose to know about that (NT)  DarthRidiculous | 01/05/06
If you OWN it, do as you wish.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/05/06
Wrong  Mad Dan | 01/05/06
Not quite accurate  voska | 01/05/06
Wrong again  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Not quite...  techboy_z | 01/05/06
You are all full of crap  jrbeaman | 01/05/06
What fine print?  voska | 01/05/06
Half right  java.user | 01/05/06
Correct  nomorems | 01/05/06
You're setting arbitrary definitions  tic swayback | 01/05/06
No  java.user | 01/05/06
Differentiate between ownership and ownership of copyright  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Corrections  java.user | 01/05/06
Now you're misquoting yourself  tic swayback | 01/05/06
As I see it...  Linux User 147560 | 01/05/06
Yet more corrections  java.user | 01/05/06
Got any more magical fairy tales you'd like to tell us?  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Yet further corrections  java.user | 01/05/06
Again, rights versus ownership of an object  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Alright, let's consolidate  java.user | 01/05/06
Consolidation is good  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Brevity is the soul of wit after all wink  java.user | 01/05/06
Another dispatch from the magical land of make believe  tic swayback | 01/06/06
yep, you are once again only imagining things happy  java.user | 01/06/06
You asked for it...  tic swayback | 01/06/06
So give it to me already! =P  java.user | 01/06/06
Hoisted by your own petard  tic swayback | 01/06/06
you may want to check to see who got hoisted wink  java.user | 01/06/06
Wow, your selective editing is impressive!  tic swayback | 01/06/06
As is your inability to read =P  java.user | 01/06/06
Think I've got you nailed on this one  tic swayback | 01/06/06
Once again, you prove my point happy  java.user | 01/06/06
Ya Gotta read those exceptions  tic swayback | 01/06/06
Sure, it goes a bit towards INTENT  java.user | 01/06/06
Here are the actual laws  tic swayback | 01/06/06
Once again, my point is proven happy  java.user | 01/06/06
You're confusing two different things  tic swayback | 01/06/06
No, I'm quoting Stanford and the EFF  java.user | 01/06/06
I don't remember agreeing to a license  tic swayback | 01/05/06
No  java.user | 01/05/06
Can I re-sell it?  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Easy  java.user | 01/05/06
Here's where your argument falls apart  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Wow  java.user | 01/05/06
Here's where you make your major mistake  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Do you even know what a copyright is?  java.user | 01/05/06
BTW  java.user | 01/05/06
Let me clear things up for you  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Great!  java.user | 01/05/06
You're still confused  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Unfortunately  java.user | 01/05/06
Now you're arguing semantics  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Actually it's intellectual vs. physical property  java.user | 01/05/06
iTunes is a completely different matter  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Yes, different because you interpreted incorrectly =P  java.user | 01/05/06
You can re-sell your iTunes license  tic swayback | 01/06/06
sigh, wrong again  java.user | 01/06/06
I guess you didn't read the whole thing  tic swayback | 01/06/06
Reading comprehension  java.user | 01/06/06
Wow, talk about reading issues!  tic swayback | 01/06/06
Yes, seriously, we should talk about it READ YOUR OWN SOURCES!!!!  java.user | 01/06/06
No contradictions here  tic swayback | 01/06/06
Gotta read those exceptions  tic swayback | 01/06/06
Gah! Posted the second response here in the wrong place  tic swayback | 01/06/06
Yet further corrections  java.user | 01/06/06
More semantic confusion  tic swayback | 01/06/06
There is confusion alright  java.user | 01/06/06
The copy is the contents  tic swayback | 01/06/06
I guess this is where we differ  java.user | 01/06/06
It is exactly that attitude that will destroy Windows Vista!  xunil skcor | 01/05/06
Dream on  java.user | 01/05/06
I dont use HDMI or HDCP, Analog Component Video 1080p works great 4 me!!!  xunil skcor | 01/06/06
Yes  java.user | 01/06/06
Gates shows off Vista in CES keynote and to  michael_t | 01/05/06
re: graphics and gaming  CobraA1 | 01/05/06
Maybe.  Anton Philidor | 01/05/06
re: graphics and gaming  Loverock Davidson | 01/05/06
how may people use flight simulator  hipparchus2001 | 01/05/06
Apple's audience is Mac users.  Anton Philidor | 01/05/06
You know for many that is probably true but not all..  Laff | 01/05/06
And now that Apple is on Intel...  Anton Philidor | 01/05/06
Yeah that's the ticket dipping into the emachines arena!!!  Laff | 01/05/06
Yes, games are a problem.  Anton Philidor | 01/05/06
I'm afraid that Dell already owns the emachines market place.  Laff | 01/05/06
Fear not.  Anton Philidor | 01/05/06
No worries here......  Laff | 01/05/06
MACs iPods and Games....  jrbeaman | 01/05/06
Myths  dolph0291 | 01/05/06
... and more myths.  Anton Philidor | 01/05/06
Apple has Servers  mrlinux | 01/05/06
Speaking in relative terms  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Measuring.  Anton Philidor | 01/05/06
ha ha ha ha ha ha ...  nomorems | 01/05/06
Bad Dday Anton?  nomorems | 01/05/06
Read the whole thread.  Anton Philidor | 01/05/06
Except that  nomorems | 01/05/06
Microsoft the majors?  Linux User 147560 | 01/05/06
Glorious summer!  Anton Philidor | 01/05/06
Anton, you having  Linux User 147560 | 01/05/06
Microsoft and marketing.  Anton Philidor | 01/05/06
Go grab some facts.  IT Scion | 01/05/06
"Get the straight facts here"  Linux User 147560 | 01/05/06
Nice try but  IT Scion | 01/05/06
For a really truthful insight  Linux User 147560 | 01/05/06
RE:Nice try but  Linux User 147560 | 01/05/06
Emphasis.  Anton Philidor | 01/05/06
No Anton, what I am saying  Linux User 147560 | 01/06/06
Poor example.  Anton Philidor | 01/06/06
No a perfect example  Linux User 147560 | 01/06/06
Get it, actually agree with it, mostly.  Anton Philidor | 01/06/06
You mean this fact from the esteemed Thurrott?  MTMacPhee | 01/05/06
Sure  IT Scion | 01/05/06
Gate$ is full of it!  Linux Geek | 01/05/06
Man the barricades.  Anton Philidor | 01/05/06
Mike Cox's evil twin?  archerjoe | 01/05/06
Linux entertaiment? Buwahahahaha  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/05/06
I don't think it's joke  voska | 01/05/06
RE: Gate$ is full of it!  alvers | 01/05/06
You're full of it too....  cicuta | 01/05/06
Linux Geek  nomorems | 01/05/06
Absolutely wonderful...  Mike Cox | 01/05/06
More importantly:  tic swayback | 01/05/06
Coffee spew  Shelendrea | 01/05/06
Ah, that's why the WMF fix isn't till Tuesday, they're all at CES (NT)  George Jay | 01/05/06
More "Black Helicopters"  Cardinal_Bill | 01/05/06
MS back to its anti-competitive roots.  Don't Ask Me | 01/05/06
re: MS back to its anti-competitive roots  deepee912 | 01/05/06
Uhh... no.  MTMacPhee | 01/05/06
Wrong  IT Scion | 01/05/06
We will see..  Don't Ask Me | 01/05/06
gates has a reputation of that  linuxoverwindows | 01/05/06
Like what?  IT Scion | 01/05/06
Can't wait  IT Scion | 01/05/06
I can't wait either....  MTMacPhee | 01/05/06
lmao  IT Scion | 01/06/06
And before  IT Scion | 01/06/06
Vista is innovative? Not...  TracyF | 01/05/06
Again  IT Scion | 01/05/06
Sry  IT Scion | 01/05/06
Now your just bragging...Big Hands indeed....:)  Laff | 01/05/06
Yea but I left myself wide open....  IT Scion | 01/05/06
I did notice that..butt decided to go for the other angle:)  Laff | 01/05/06
I'm sure...  IT Scion | 01/05/06
You know what they say about big hands right?  Shelendrea | 01/05/06
Sure.....Big Hands...Big.....  IT Scion | 01/05/06
Little Laptop  Shelendrea | 01/05/06
So true!  999ad@... | 01/05/06
You forgot 1  stephen0838_z | 01/05/06
Where have all these 'industry' people been hiding?  Tim Carpenter | 01/05/06
Do it better?!  Andromedat6 | 01/05/06
Another claim with no facts.  jrbeaman | 01/05/06
Am I exited about Bill Gate$???  Betelgeuse58 | 01/05/06
ok  Shelendrea | 01/05/06
Shelendrea, you GO girl!!!!  Betelgeuse58 | 01/05/06
Absurd  Anton Philidor | 01/05/06
Hey Anton  Shelendrea | 01/06/06
bill gates at it again  chicobaby37 | 01/05/06
Microsoft: Too Big For It's Own Breeches....  guitar_samuri | 01/06/06
Answers already exist...  Anton Philidor | 01/06/06
Yes they do but Microsoft is not always the answer...  Linux User 147560 | 01/06/06
Help please......  angela_6uk | 01/06/06
Part of the answer.  Anton Philidor | 01/06/06
Drop me a line at  Linux User 147560 | 01/06/06
Hope this helps  java.user | 01/07/06
Help please......  angela_6uk | 01/06/06
Auto commercial skip  lonniemcclure | 01/07/06
No  java.user | 01/07/06
Face It  CharlieSolak | 01/08/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here