On UrbanBaby: Do modern parents try too hard?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 15:
Next »
We need a prior art database
I am sure I saw this on software programs well before they filed this patent.

Even still, this should not pass the non-obvious test.
Posted by: Patrick Jones   Posted on: 08/30/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

We need a prior art database  Patrick Jones | 08/30/05
I agree. Not to mention, didn't Apple get one for the same foolish thing.  el1jones | 08/30/05
RE: prior art  JakAttak | 08/30/05
If there IS prior art.. find it...  TheProtector | 08/30/05
Horrible  opensourcepro | 08/30/05
Yeah, too bad  Hayvern | 08/30/05
Rampant idiocy.  Henry Miller | 08/30/05
Reality Check  Yensi717 | 08/30/05
Don't gripe on ZDNet...  Henry Miller | 08/30/05
Good idea. Thanks (nt)  el1jones | 08/30/05
Better yet...  jtnixon | 08/30/05
It has nothing to do with QUALITY...  TheProtector | 08/30/05
Steve messed up again.  dzash2000 | 08/31/05
I think you need to check back a little further  Rick_K | 08/31/05
WikiPatents.com - Prior Art Database  wikipatents | 08/22/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More