On GameSpot: The booths, babes, and toys of TGS 2009!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 9 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
1000 vs 1024
Storage has always talked about K as 1000 bytes versus 1024; M as 1,000,000 vs 1,048,576; etc.

If I owe someone $1K, most will correctly interpret it as $1,000. If the system uses 1K of memory, that would be 1024 bytes.

Why mass storage has consistently used the one defintion instead of the other is beyond me -- but they have been consistent over the years.
Posted by: __howard__   Posted on: 06/07/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

500 GB isn't 1/2 a terabyte  emcee_z | 06/06/05
Mount them in front of a fan  osreinstall | 06/06/05
Agreed  erdiko@... | 06/06/05
Just the exact opposite...  bad2thebone_z | 06/07/05
Nah, nah, nah, Seagate's reliability is well documented...  MepisLINUXuser | 06/07/05
New dell with maxtor died  Protector | 06/07/05
From my experience  voska | 06/07/05
Then what is it?  erdiko@... | 06/06/05
1000 vs 1024  __howard__ | 06/07/05
Just a small correction ...  Ludovit | 06/07/05
1024 vs 1000  CrazY_UKRaiNiaN | 06/07/05
Actually  voska | 06/07/05
Still not quite right  emcee_z | 06/07/05
Re 1000 vs 1024  Letophoro | 06/07/05
Very easy to figure  osreinstall | 06/07/05
250 hours of HDTV?  __howard__ | 06/07/05
Ahh, you're right.  UncleBubba | 06/07/05
At 2 GB per DVD movie  voska | 06/07/05
and who takes pictures that are 300k ?  MIS Master | 06/07/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Meet Doc