On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 7:
Next »
The smart move would be to let Google have it.
Let Google spend the 4 or 5 billion and watch them struggle to meet the service requirements (coverage area and access) set by the FCC.

With zero infastructure (cell towers, backbone to the towers, switch gear, etc., etc.) the chaces of them actually being able to meet coverage requirements is next to nil.

I suppose they could try and partner with an existing player but they would have to convince them that giving away their existing business is a good idea and that will be extremely hard to do.
Posted by: No_Ax_to_Grind   Posted on: 02/06/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

The smart move would be to let Google have it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/08
Why are we bidding on wireless ranges?  Been_Done_Before | 02/06/08
I'm not expert, but...  jack@... | 02/06/08
There is the problem, then, and an answer to  GuidingLight | 02/06/08
Nationalize  mighetto | 02/07/08
Only a years notice? Bought all new last year!  TiggerTom | 02/06/08
Thumbs up for open access networks  John Musbach | 02/11/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here