On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 7:
Next »
The smart move would be to let Google have it.
Let Google spend the 4 or 5 billion and watch them struggle to meet the service requirements (coverage area and access) set by the FCC.

With zero infastructure (cell towers, backbone to the towers, switch gear, etc., etc.) the chaces of them actually being able to meet coverage requirements is next to nil.

I suppose they could try and partner with an existing player but they would have to convince them that giving away their existing business is a good idea and that will be extremely hard to do.
Posted by: No_Ax_to_Grind   Posted on: 02/06/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

The smart move would be to let Google have it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/08
Why are we bidding on wireless ranges?  Been_Done_Before | 02/06/08
I'm not expert, but...  jack@... | 02/06/08
There is the problem, then, and an answer to  GuidingLight | 02/06/08
Nationalize  mighetto | 02/07/08
Only a years notice? Bought all new last year!  TiggerTom | 02/06/08
Thumbs up for open access networks  John Musbach | 02/11/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

IT Solutions for 2010

  • Get cost-effective strategies and roadmaps on the most important issues facing IT leaders in 2010! Learn how to easily cut costs and deliver greater efficiency starting with your database, IT compliance management and data center. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard.
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline