On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 25 of 56:
Next »
« Previous
Indeed
"I doubt that your ISP never intended for their customers to run 1.5 for hours at a time. Therein is the problem."

I agree completely. My ISP is also the local telco (DSL) and I live in a very rural area. When I first signed up with them I was the only one with DSL through the local CO which meant I pretty much got everything (speed) I signed up for. The problem is that the telco has now added a lot of customers but have not increased the bandwidth to the CO so speeds have and continue to drop as more are added.

Yes we complain (quite loudly) about it and the excuse is always the same, there aren't enough cusotners to justify bringing more bandwidth to the CO. Ok, I sort of understand that however I would argue that it isn't true and here is why.

A WISP is installing WiMAX in the area to compete against the telco and instead of competeing the telco has filed a law suit trying every trick they can think of to stop it from happening. Surely if the WISP see's a potentcial for return on investment then so should the telco. Ah, but that means investment and they can no longer milk the cash cow the old twisted pair represents.

This same thing is being played out all across the nation. Instead of real competition we see the telcos, WISP's, and cable companies trying to fight it out in the court room and through the FCC. Of course the real losers in this are the consumers.

If our federal government didn't have a track record of screwing up a free meal I would say to heck with it and nationalize the entire US internet...
Posted by: No_Ax_to_Grind   Posted on: 11/04/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Freedom for a few. Police State for the people. People are cattle. Happy?  Hot379 | 11/02/07
Cattle, yes for the most part  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/03/07
almost forgot... net neutrality issue  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/03/07
YES METER THE BITS  westks | 11/05/07
Wrong title for article...  mrlinux1@... | 11/02/07
RE: Thanks to BitTorrrent, Net neutrality debate reignites  WISP | 11/02/07
Cool it Sparky  GrubLord | 11/02/07
funny you mention banks  catseverywhere@... | 11/07/07
By the way...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/03/07
and you are debatable  X41 | 11/03/07
What is your malfunction child?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/03/07
People pay $50/mo for 768u/1500d  HypnoToad72 | 11/04/07
Excuse me?  djchandler | 11/05/07
I can see both sides of it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/03/07
Well put! - NT  raycote | 11/04/07
Severs  voska | 11/05/07
RE: Thanks to BitTorrrent, Net neutrality debate reignites  WISP | 11/03/07
Your argument falls apart...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/03/07
Paying for it  X41 | 11/03/07
WHo are you talking too?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/03/07
They never promised 10Mb  Bozzer | 11/07/07
What are you paying?  WISP | 11/04/07
756 up 1500 down for $45 a month  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/07
756 up 1.5 down  WISP | 11/04/07
Indeed  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/07
Indeed!!  WISP | 11/04/07
Sorry, NATG.  djchandler | 11/05/07
Upload is the expensive bandwith  zmud | 11/03/07
People are surprised  Kaiwai | 11/04/07
re: People are surprised  jjjjofus | 11/05/07
Buy a dedicate pipe then.  Bozzer | 11/07/07
Absolutely agree here.  Raymond Danner | 11/08/07
Well, Bittorrent offers more than illegal stuff.  HypnoToad72 | 11/04/07
And some Mexicans crossing the border  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/07
Ridiculous  Tim Patterson | 11/05/07
1 in 100  Bozzer | 11/07/07
IMO, That was rather dumb, No_Axe.  Raymond Danner | 11/08/07
Fourier-esque bullsh*t  Omch'Ar | 11/04/07
Rather dogmatic there, Omch'Ar.  Raymond Danner | 11/08/07
False advertising, plain and simple  terry flores | 11/04/07
The fact is 1% of users take 99% of the bandwidth  mrjonno | 11/05/07
Bandwidth  Tim Patterson | 11/05/07
Check your contract  Tank252ca | 11/05/07
Um  library assistant | 11/05/07
Every ISP at least in the UK  mrjonno | 11/05/07
I've learned over the years...  Raymond Danner | 11/08/07
RE: Thanks to BitTorrrent, Net neutrality debate reignites  mikemc3@... | 11/05/07
not so  library assistant | 11/05/07
Good Point - but ...  mikemc3@... | 11/06/07
Good Point, but wrong  propat@... | 11/06/07
Oh, so if ZDNet decided...  Raymond Danner | 11/08/07
RE: Thanks to BitTorrrent, Net neutrality debate reignites  PlanBForOpenOffice | 11/05/07
stuff  lindfalas@... | 11/05/07
Deja vu all over again  library assistant | 11/05/07
Wow...that much!!!???  kissimeePC | 11/05/07
yeah, once again  vilppuu@... | 11/05/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here