On TV.com: Confession: I Like THE BIG BANG THEORY
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 14 of 56:
Next »
« Previous
I can see both sides of it.
Yes, I can see where something like BitTorrent (or video of any kind) can cause extreme traffic over a given network which *may* cause issues for other users. I can also see the users side when they pay a fee for a minimum bandwidth allocation and then can't get it.

It seems to me though the real issue is how bandwidth is sold. The idea of $X a month for an "all you can eat" type of service means some users are going to use every bit of bandwidth available to them and in some cases do it at the detriment of other users. (Think of the one guy that comes to a buffet lunch and cleans out all the food.)

There is also the issue that the ISPs won't enforce their own rules and policies for fear of losing a customer. Almost all of them have some sort of rules about running a server from a standard cable or DSL connection and make no mistake, if you are sharing files you ARE running a server. It's far easier to do some sort of "group" thing (bloking/slowing certain apps) than it is to actually enforce their polices on specific individules.

Is there a solution? You bet, fatter pipes all around. If you look at the POTS line into a home the average person pays $20 a minth for the line and it really is "all you can eat" for local calls. You can call mom down the street and talk as long as you like. Why? Because the system was designed with the idea in mind that some people will in fact sit on the phone for hours. In other words, the capacity is built into the infastructure and is added to any time its needed to maintain this level of service.

The plain fact here is that in the US the ISPs and back bone providers have not worked together to provide the levels of service users want and need. Other countries are not having this problem and it seems rather obvious to me that it should not be a problem in the country that invented/built the internet.

I place the blame for it directly at the feet of politicians afraid of angering their campain contributors...
Posted by: No_Ax_to_Grind   Posted on: 11/03/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Freedom for a few. Police State for the people. People are cattle. Happy?  Hot379 | 11/02/07
Cattle, yes for the most part  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/03/07
almost forgot... net neutrality issue  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/03/07
YES METER THE BITS  westks | 11/05/07
Wrong title for article...  mrlinux1@... | 11/02/07
RE: Thanks to BitTorrrent, Net neutrality debate reignites  WISP | 11/02/07
Cool it Sparky  GrubLord | 11/02/07
funny you mention banks  catseverywhere@... | 11/07/07
By the way...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/03/07
and you are debatable  X41 | 11/03/07
What is your malfunction child?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/03/07
People pay $50/mo for 768u/1500d  HypnoToad72 | 11/04/07
Excuse me?  djchandler | 11/05/07
I can see both sides of it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/03/07
Well put! - NT  raycote | 11/04/07
Severs  voska | 11/05/07
RE: Thanks to BitTorrrent, Net neutrality debate reignites  WISP | 11/03/07
Your argument falls apart...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/03/07
Paying for it  X41 | 11/03/07
WHo are you talking too?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/03/07
They never promised 10Mb  Bozzer | 11/07/07
What are you paying?  WISP | 11/04/07
756 up 1500 down for $45 a month  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/07
756 up 1.5 down  WISP | 11/04/07
Indeed  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/07
Indeed!!  WISP | 11/04/07
Sorry, NATG.  djchandler | 11/05/07
Upload is the expensive bandwith  zmud | 11/03/07
People are surprised  Kaiwai | 11/04/07
re: People are surprised  jjjjofus | 11/05/07
Buy a dedicate pipe then.  Bozzer | 11/07/07
Absolutely agree here.  Raymond Danner | 11/08/07
Well, Bittorrent offers more than illegal stuff.  HypnoToad72 | 11/04/07
And some Mexicans crossing the border  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/07
Ridiculous  Tim Patterson | 11/05/07
1 in 100  Bozzer | 11/07/07
IMO, That was rather dumb, No_Axe.  Raymond Danner | 11/08/07
Fourier-esque bullsh*t  Omch'Ar | 11/04/07
Rather dogmatic there, Omch'Ar.  Raymond Danner | 11/08/07
False advertising, plain and simple  terry flores | 11/04/07
The fact is 1% of users take 99% of the bandwidth  mrjonno | 11/05/07
Bandwidth  Tim Patterson | 11/05/07
Check your contract  Tank252ca | 11/05/07
Um  library assistant | 11/05/07
Every ISP at least in the UK  mrjonno | 11/05/07
I've learned over the years...  Raymond Danner | 11/08/07
RE: Thanks to BitTorrrent, Net neutrality debate reignites  mikemc3@... | 11/05/07
not so  library assistant | 11/05/07
Good Point - but ...  mikemc3@... | 11/06/07
Good Point, but wrong  propat@... | 11/06/07
Oh, so if ZDNet decided...  Raymond Danner | 11/08/07
RE: Thanks to BitTorrrent, Net neutrality debate reignites  PlanBForOpenOffice | 11/05/07
stuff  lindfalas@... | 11/05/07
Deja vu all over again  library assistant | 11/05/07
Wow...that much!!!???  kissimeePC | 11/05/07
yeah, once again  vilppuu@... | 11/05/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here