On TV.com: 5 TV Shows We'd Love on the BIG SCREEN
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
Just like any industry, those unwilling to make investments in new
technology will get left behind. In this case, the laggards were sitting on valuable bandwidth that can be used for next generation communications. Better to get them off of their fat arses.
Posted by: DonnieBoy   Posted on: 08/01/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Color me confused...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/31/07
They were given other valuable frequencies to broadcast digital TV.  DonnieBoy | 07/31/07
Penalized?  John Zern | 08/01/07
Unlike others, Google does not want to use the bandwidth to limit  DonnieBoy | 08/01/07
What in the world are you ranting about?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/01/07
Man, cry me a river. Poor TV stations not willing to move into the 21st  DonnieBoy | 08/01/07
Like I said, your talk is cheap  John Zern | 08/01/07
Just like any industry, those unwilling to make investments in new  DonnieBoy | 08/01/07
WRONG!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/01/07
Where you are dead wrong  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/01/07
The source of your confusion is simple.  Letophoro | 08/01/07
Didn't help much.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/01/07
Right, TV stations would like viewers limited to 50 year old technology  DonnieBoy | 08/01/07
Disagree  kgrimm@... | 08/01/07
Are you clueless?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/01/07
just keep the spectrum out of M$ hands!  Linux Geek | 08/01/07
Shut up, fool! (nt)  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/01/07
You see the world as a reflection of yourself! - NT  raycote | 08/01/07
A couple of important words.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/01/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads