On CNET: Keep your software up-to-date
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 11 of 34:
Next »
« Previous
"Possession" as crime is a crock
I'm somewhat surprised that the person who received the email and who reported the guy wasn't charged with possession, too! ("But I deleted it!" Do you know what it takes to actually delete the data within an email or surfed web page these days???)

Between botnets, viruses, unsecured networks (not just WIFI), bad passwords, people with bad taste enough to seek out child porn, pedophiles, and child abusers and rapists (there is a very important different between all of those), there's probably child porn on millions of U.S. PCs. The law simply isn't fit to deal with "possession" as a crime any more than having possession of downloaded copyrighted material necessarily justifies charging you with a crime. Case in point: have you viewed copyrighted YouTube videos? Do you have any MP3's you didn't aquire from an official source? Then you're a criminal, too! Did you know you could be a criminal just for having a stranger in the background of a picture you take at a park in some places??? Parents have already been accused of being a "sexual predator" for having taken bath pictures of their unclothed babies!!! Dang - my mom is a sexual predator! She's got me naked up on the wall in her house right now!!!

*sigh*

Sooner or later we're going to have to, as a society, realize that "possession" is not the problem. Taking a picture is not the problem. We need to spend our resources targeting the people that actually violate another's rights and those that support them by buying it.
Posted by: stormculture   Posted on: 04/18/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Guilty or not, he's guilty of  bjbrock | 04/18/07
Destruction of Email  mighetto | 04/18/07
Americans demand what?  jhand47201 | 04/22/07
Some police do understand these issues, or at least listen  jscully@... | 04/18/07
I thank you for educating them....  el1jones | 04/18/07
modern day witch hunt  conspicuouschick | 04/18/07
Child Porn is extremely nasty...  JohnBoyTheGreat | 04/18/07
RE: "looking at something"  mikebellman | 04/19/07
no you don't have to seek it out  jhand47201 | 04/22/07
Thank you indead  mighetto | 04/18/07
"Possession" as crime is a crock  stormculture | 04/18/07
Absolutely right!  JohnBoyTheGreat | 04/18/07
very dense housing  JJohnson@... | 04/18/07
This will limit open WIFI use  sstevens@... | 04/18/07
Government supplied what?  markdean | 04/18/07
but when it's YOUR property  nancyjones36507@... | 01/17/08
Will be a problem  mames1701 | 04/18/07
Open WiFi doesn't put physical media in the house.  felix52 | 04/18/07
True, True...  RealAusTech | 04/18/07
another question  conspicuouschick | 04/18/07
Can't this type of info be spoofed?  frankv@... | 04/18/07
it happened to me  jhand47201 | 04/22/07
WiFi blame is misplaced  intrepi@... | 04/18/07
Partly right  markdean | 04/18/07
No one is Blaming The WiFi  frankv@... | 04/18/07
Kiddie Porn  GeneBuettner | 04/18/07
this is  KingSatan | 04/18/07
Guilty of bad legal advise?  jc williams | 04/18/07
The issue isn't whether he actually had porn  Jack&Jill | 04/18/07
Where is the harm.  joe6pack_z | 04/18/07
How did you hurt anybody?  G Fedorchuk | 04/25/07
Blackmail  Mnighthawk | 04/18/07
RE: The harm - children and sex  mikebellman | 04/19/07
Here's the problem...  backwards | 10/20/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here