On CHOW: Is it OK to blow your nose at the table?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 34:
Next »
« Previous
Thank you indead
Every year some poor sap who works for DSHS at the State of Washington is fired for porn on their state supplied computer. It always makes the papers. After 5 or so years, I started doubting that the fired employees actually were stupid enough to put porn on a computer. I mean after so much press, why go there even if addicted to that kind of thing.

Then even without a virus, I realized that it wasn't hard to do some poor fellow in if you wanted to. A payment to some network administrator who planned on or was already out of the USA or someone responsible for automatic operating system updates is all it would take.

VNC, Net Meeting, GotoMyPC all become instruments of wrong doing when porn on a hard drive can get you fired, searched or jailed. Once the computer is attached to a network the user no longer controls it. That also applies to "secure" networks.

How can the mere presence of child porn on a hard drive really be enough justification for a search warrant in this environment. It can not be.

The article really is pointing out this situation which I suspect exists ONLY IN THE USA. The facts of this case - the guilty plea etc obscure what any IT Professional will testify in court to. Computers attached to networks are not under user control. What is on them, by itself, means nothing. There really should be more than that before search warrants or even suspicion.
Posted by: mighetto   Posted on: 04/18/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Guilty or not, he's guilty of  bjbrock | 04/18/07
Destruction of Email  mighetto | 04/18/07
Americans demand what?  jhand47201 | 04/22/07
Some police do understand these issues, or at least listen  jscully@... | 04/18/07
I thank you for educating them....  el1jones | 04/18/07
modern day witch hunt  conspicuouschick | 04/18/07
Child Porn is extremely nasty...  JohnBoyTheGreat | 04/18/07
RE: "looking at something"  mikebellman | 04/19/07
no you don't have to seek it out  jhand47201 | 04/22/07
Thank you indead  mighetto | 04/18/07
"Possession" as crime is a crock  stormculture | 04/18/07
Absolutely right!  JohnBoyTheGreat | 04/18/07
very dense housing  JJohnson@... | 04/18/07
This will limit open WIFI use  sstevens@... | 04/18/07
Government supplied what?  markdean | 04/18/07
but when it's YOUR property  nancyjones36507@... | 01/17/08
Will be a problem  mames1701 | 04/18/07
Open WiFi doesn't put physical media in the house.  felix52 | 04/18/07
True, True...  RealAusTech | 04/18/07
another question  conspicuouschick | 04/18/07
Can't this type of info be spoofed?  frankv@... | 04/18/07
it happened to me  jhand47201 | 04/22/07
WiFi blame is misplaced  intrepi@... | 04/18/07
Partly right  markdean | 04/18/07
No one is Blaming The WiFi  frankv@... | 04/18/07
Kiddie Porn  GeneBuettner | 04/18/07
this is  KingSatan | 04/18/07
Guilty of bad legal advise?  jc williams | 04/18/07
The issue isn't whether he actually had porn  Jack&Jill | 04/18/07
Where is the harm.  joe6pack_z | 04/18/07
How did you hurt anybody?  G Fedorchuk | 04/25/07
Blackmail  Mnighthawk | 04/18/07
RE: The harm - children and sex  mikebellman | 04/19/07
Here's the problem...  backwards | 10/20/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and