On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 12 of 21:
Next »
« Previous
Identifiable Data
The only data turned over to the NSA was the calling and called numbers and how long the call was. This is something the Supreme Court has already ruled is legal without a warrant and within the powers of the president to order. Now if they wanted personal information from the telephone company ot wanted to monitor the call that would be different and the monitor restriction is only valid if both ends of the call is in the U.S. If one end of the call is outside the U.S. The NSA doesn't need a warrant to monitor it.
Posted by: richhayes   Posted on: 05/16/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Case law cite  erc@... | 05/15/06
Counterpoint  aemc | 05/15/06
So what about Quest and Cingular who refused?  mighetto | 05/15/06
Privacy???  Dave P. | 05/15/06
Phone numbers  kastro | 05/16/06
You missed something..  thetruth_z | 05/15/06
A government agency without a court order HMMMMM  rem1010 | 05/15/06
As with above  aemc | 05/15/06
You didn't read the first paragraph at top below the 5 tabs.  osreinstall | 05/15/06
Court Order Needed?  richhayes | 05/16/06
Yes it is needed.  osreinstall | 05/16/06
Identifiable Data  richhayes | 05/16/06
It is identifiable  osreinstall | 05/16/06
Yes, a court order(warrant) is required..  thetruth_z | 05/16/06
President & Congress  richhayes | 05/17/06
Message has been deleted.  DarbyOhara | 05/15/06
DOJ is the largest law firm it represents the Government  mighetto | 05/15/06
Read the law's definition of "Government"  aemc | 05/15/06
I said this 4 years ago  sykandtyed | 05/15/06
We wouldn't have to worry about Iran today  Dave P. | 05/15/06
Not just phone records  schwana | 05/16/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here