On last.fm: Interview with the mini mall rap guy!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 21:
Next »
« Previous
So what about Quest and Cingular who refused?
Refusal did not result in the 1994 act being used againse Quest and Cingular. Think about those folks who use to think Abramoff a good fellow and donated money to them, perhaps after phone calls. Serious violation of privacy here. Serious potential trouble for folks loaning cell phones to others as well or perhaps a thug borrows your phone and returns it to you before you know it was missing.
Posted by: mighetto   Posted on: 05/15/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Case law cite  erc@... | 05/15/06
Counterpoint  aemc | 05/15/06
So what about Quest and Cingular who refused?  mighetto | 05/15/06
Privacy???  Dave P. | 05/15/06
Phone numbers  kastro | 05/16/06
You missed something..  thetruth_z | 05/15/06
A government agency without a court order HMMMMM  rem1010 | 05/15/06
As with above  aemc | 05/15/06
You didn't read the first paragraph at top below the 5 tabs.  osreinstall | 05/15/06
Court Order Needed?  richhayes | 05/16/06
Yes it is needed.  osreinstall | 05/16/06
Identifiable Data  richhayes | 05/16/06
It is identifiable  osreinstall | 05/16/06
Yes, a court order(warrant) is required..  thetruth_z | 05/16/06
President & Congress  richhayes | 05/17/06
Message has been deleted.  DarbyOhara | 05/15/06
DOJ is the largest law firm it represents the Government  mighetto | 05/15/06
Read the law's definition of "Government"  aemc | 05/15/06
I said this 4 years ago  sykandtyed | 05/15/06
We wouldn't have to worry about Iran today  Dave P. | 05/15/06
Not just phone records  schwana | 05/16/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here