Bills would boost unlicensed Wi-Fi

TalkBack 2 of 11:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

standard compliance needed

I would not like to buy a device that is not working only becausesomeone in my neighborhood uses another device from another manufacturer that does not obey to the same standard.

Absence of licence for usage does not (should not) mean absence of regulation: there's the need for a reliable and interoperable standard that respects the rights of users.

Manufacturers MUST respect an approved standard, and customers MUST look at the FCC-compliance label for these standards before buying and using these devices. Also a defect in the product should not harm other users (this means that devices must take severe controls tolimit their power and emission spectrum: nothing should be emitted if required built-in compliance tests fails.

Posted by: PhilippeV   Posted on: 02/22/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Virtualization: Architectural Considerations And Other Evaluation Criteria VMware Of the many approaches to x86 systems virtualization available in the ... Download Now
• Get top-ranked Novell support for Red Hat at 50% less Novell A simplified IT environment isn't just less complex, it's more reliable. ... Download Now
• Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now