On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Holiday Shopping Tips
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 29 of 29:
« Previous
"Politico.........."
While I generally approve of Mr. McCain this article is full of almost everything except hard truth.

"If this spectrum was available on Aug. 28, 2005," he said, referring to the date Hurricane Katrina struck the port city, "a lot of things would have been different."

Having this spectrum available would not have changed the fact that people were not evacuated.
Having this spectrum available would not make radios that use this spectrum magically appear.
These radios have to be designed, developed, approved by the FCC as well as other agencies, put into production and paid for by the various agencies who will use them as well as time for installation and training.
This would have done nothing to make up for the incompetance of people in charge there.

"Enthusiasm for the shift to digital television extends well into the technology realm..."

Gosh, what a surprise! "By one consumer group's count, as many as 80 million television sets rely on analog signals, and would need to be wired for digital cable or outfitted with the digital-to-analog converter boxes."

"But by 2009, only about 7 percent of television viewers--still several million--will be relying solely on analog, "over-the-air" broadcasts, according to Consumer Electronics Association estimates."

So the CEA believes that maybe 70 million sets (depending on number of sets per viewer, slick transition there between number of sets and percentage of viewers) will be digital-ready in some 3 years? Sounds awfully optimistic to me.

So much bs, doubletalk, apples-to-oranges comparisons and plain old spin.
Posted by: bony tryan   Posted on: 10/19/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Hay John don?t bother running for president if you push this.  Palmyra | 10/18/05
This is embarrassing  Palmyra | 10/18/05
Oh, I don't know...  rapson | 10/18/05
Hay? Tax and spend, lol  Oknarf | 10/18/05
Tax cuts also...  Zinoron | 10/18/05
Oh, but you will pay...  el1jones | 10/18/05
Econ 101  Oknarf | 10/18/05
I was awake in that class...  Zinoron | 10/18/05
Too true...  Oknarf | 10/18/05
If you were awake in class ...  ShadeTree | 10/18/05
I'll comment  tic swayback | 10/18/05
Well put ...  Oknarf | 10/18/05
Confuse the issuse?!?  el1jones | 10/18/05
And it shows...  Oknarf | 10/18/05
Good point  tic swayback | 10/18/05
What is pork spending?  voska | 10/18/05
Ah the joys of Wikipedia  tic swayback | 10/18/05
Do you even know the difference between a ...  ShadeTree | 10/18/05
A tax in hidden form  tic swayback | 10/18/05
If it looks like duck, sounds like a duck, and smells like a duck  voska | 10/18/05
oh, for crying out loud . . .  CobraA1 | 10/18/05
Splitters don't work on Digital  voska | 10/19/05
In other words  Otto_Delete | 10/18/05
Is this the real problem?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/18/05
For once!  jacarter3 | 10/18/05
Good points... do they really need...  el1jones | 10/18/05
It's a combination of things  tic swayback | 10/18/05
Cable or Satellite Subsidies?  Rodney Davis | 10/18/05
"Politico.........."  bony tryan | 10/19/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here