On last.fm: 2009 summer music festivals
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 16 of 20:
Next »
« Previous
So what really is filtering?
It's really more insidious than simple filtering. It's a clear case when an ISP specifically filters out or intentionally degrades a particular service or protocol. It's not so clear when a provider negatively impacts a service or protocol as a result of legitimately prioritizing traffic.

In many cases it's not possible for a provider to have unlimited bandwidth to all locations. If that provider needs to prioritize specific traffic to ensure performance for a paying customer or class of customers, and that results in degradation of other services and protocols, does that constitute an illegal limitation on traffic under this type of legislation? What if they have their own VoIP service for which they have QoS settings that result in degraded performance for other VoIP services? Are they not entitled to ensure the best performance for the services they are selling? What if that QoS setting is to prioritize some video protocol or another particularly time critical application? If that impacts some other service does that constitute filtering that's prohibited? Is real-time gaming a protocol that is going to be protected? Should it be? It's a complex issue.

On the flip-side, what if a provider intentionally degrades another competing service using overwhelming prioritizing of other traffic? They could plan to have bandwidth limited (supposedly due to the cost of delivery) with the result being poor performance for the competing service. How do you determine this as being different from the above?

Isn't this a situation where market forces should determine the result? If the service doesn't suit them, they should go elsewhere.
Posted by: n8dnx   Posted on: 09/19/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Useless half staps.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/15/05
This is not layer 3 (OSI) stuff!  B.O.F.H. | 09/15/05
BAM!!!  Jeff Spicoli | 09/15/05
What no wimax steamroller?  Protector | 09/16/05
Wrong guy  Roger Ramjet | 09/16/05
the "steamroller" will lose its steam after all the corporate lobbying  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/05
Interesting to note  Roger Ramjet | 09/19/05
Actually  Real World | 09/16/05
Sorry, the ASCII diagram sucks!  B.O.F.H. | 09/16/05
Now explain it to a Congress critter in a way he understands.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/05
You have already shown that you don't understand networks!  B.O.F.H. | 09/16/05
Child, I was trying to express a thought in simple terms.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/05
It would appear that this is a limiation of yours.  B.O.F.H. | 09/16/05
No "filtering" allowed?  The-Bytemaster | 09/15/05
Re: No "filtering" allowed?  rmerts@... | 09/16/05
So what really is filtering?  n8dnx | 09/19/05
Keep your hands off my BYTES!  Roger Ramjet | 09/16/05
and here you have your answer  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/05
Keep your hands off my ISP!!!  n8dnx | 09/18/05
Pervasive Govenment  nevtxjustin@... | 10/03/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here