On GameSpot: Modern Warfare 2 sells 4.7M in 24 hours
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 21:
Next »
« Previous
A few quick comments, too.
You wrote:
The support requirements could very easily be next to nil, with ISPs doing front-line support.

The ISPs, if they agree to go everywhere in a city, will have to be paid.
And someone has to be responsible for the users.


You wrote:
DOS-ing a wireless network is both harder to do and more tracable than the same trick with a callbox.

As the equivalent to snipping the cord on a police callbox, I was thinking of a destructive action at an installation, not a DoS attack.


You wrote:
In any case, the technology and cost motivators are driving cities to use wireless networking for everything from scheduling to stoplights and that's not going to change, so they're going to put in all of those access points regardless.

Not if they can't afford it because it's much more expensive than the costs of existing systems. Because those systems are already in place, the installation cost for them is obviously $0 (upgrades excluded).


You wrote:
The commercial monopolies (power, phone, and cable) on the other hand have gotten much more expensive while at best maintaining the prior low quality of service.

Well, the Mayor of San Francisco did say he was worried about the price rising eventually. (He was right to do so.)
At this time, however, cable and phone are still competing with each other and with other technologies. The price is comparatively low, for now.


Finally, you wrote:
At the service level, they don't need customers because they're provisioning their own needs and aren't displacing any of the current services.

Well, the plans we've been discussing have included providing services to residents of the municipalities. Comparable services are also provided by cable and telephone companies.
So, yes, they are in competition.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 08/18/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Re: S.F. keeps pushing citywide Wi-Fi  none none | 08/17/05
Linux for the urban poor?  Real World | 08/18/05
No company would provide the service.  Anton Philidor | 08/17/05
WiMAX inoculation  Roger Ramjet | 08/18/05
And every one of those wireless access points...  Anton Philidor | 08/18/05
Substitution  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/18/05
The public is the main recipient of this service...  Anton Philidor | 08/18/05
Municipal services  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/18/05
Context numbers.  Anton Philidor | 08/18/05
A few quick comments, too.  Anton Philidor | 08/18/05
Anton you are wrong on this one.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/18/05
Examples are important...  Anton Philidor | 08/18/05
Math, redux  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/18/05
Math  Roger Ramjet | 08/18/05
Pie tomorrow  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/18/05
Hands across America  Roger Ramjet | 08/18/05
Maths yet again  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/18/05
Find one laptop, cellphone or mobile device that supports WiMAX now!  B.O.F.H. | 08/18/05
Ask IEEE  Roger Ramjet | 08/19/05
Where?  zclayton2 | 08/18/05
Here's where I heard about it.  Anton Philidor | 08/18/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More