On last.fm: Interview with the mini mall rap guy!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 16 of 50:
Next »
« Previous
still not catching on
The guest PC has the ability to first detect any available hotspots before connecting to them. The person using the guest PC still has to choose which hotspot to use, unless they have configured their WiFi card to automatically connect to the first available hotspot.

Detecting a hotspot and actively using it are two different things. I can walk around my neighborhood jiggling door handles but I don't have to enter the ones that are unlocked.

Not caring and not knowing are two different things as far as locking down a wireless router is concerned.

As for your old couch, you CHOOSE to give it away. How do you know that everyone who has an open hotspot intended to give away access unless they explicitly told you?

And the simple act of requesting for access automatically grants access? I'll have to try that out at the local bank's vault.

An open hotspot is not an open invitation to use it. If don't mind that anyone can use your hotspot, then people using it aren't stealing it. Just like if you want anyone to be able to stay in your home, then they aren't trespassing or breaking in. But if you choose to leave your doors unlocked, its not an open invitation. I'm through. We both have an opinion, I can't help it if your's is wrong.
Posted by: ibabadur1   Posted on: 07/08/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Interesting question arises -  klmmicro | 07/08/05
concordance  wlabarre@... | 07/08/05
I wonder how they'll handle open wifi  Nigel Johnstone | 07/08/05
Yup  Protector | 07/08/05
Invent a law again  Nigel Johnstone | 07/08/05
All depends  ibabadur1 | 07/08/05
Intentionally accessing your house at 3:00 AM  Knorthern Knight | 07/08/05
The Law  nkallner@... | 07/08/05
There's more to this than we're being told...  BitTwiddler | 07/08/05
No way to know  tic swayback | 07/08/05
THIS IS GETTING INSANE  Protector | 07/08/05
Same logic....  ibabadur1 | 07/08/05
Not true...  low-life | 07/08/05
I'm slow, so help me out here  ibabadur1 | 07/08/05
Sure...  low-life | 07/08/05
still not catching on  ibabadur1 | 07/08/05
Flawed analogies  tic swayback | 07/08/05
NOT!  bchesmer | 07/08/05
try this one  Dave F_z | 07/10/05
I do see one point in your argument.  low-life | 07/08/05
I see  ibabadur1 | 07/08/05
Re: I see  low-life | 07/08/05
Free Services  Vicissidude | 07/09/05
More Appropriate Metaphor  Vicissidude | 07/09/05
I Bet If He Worked For Homeland Security He Would Have Been Ok  itanalyst | 07/08/05
Open invitation  tic swayback | 07/08/05
Interesting thought  ibabadur1 | 07/08/05
Interference  tic swayback | 07/08/05
Next question  tic swayback | 07/08/05
Another Question  itanalyst | 07/08/05
When the RIAA comes knocking  GrumpyOldMan | 07/08/05
Right  tic swayback | 07/08/05
BULL!  raymanjr | 07/08/05
Using precedent . . .  Roger Ramjet | 07/08/05
Not sure I agree  tic swayback | 07/08/05
Might be true  Roger Ramjet | 07/08/05
Invitations  tic swayback | 07/08/05
Not true...  bchesmer | 07/08/05
That should be OK  Knorthern Knight | 07/08/05
Depends on the wording  tic swayback | 07/08/05
out of box experience  MIS Master | 07/08/05
Federal law and Wi-Fi mooching  realgomer | 07/08/05
You got it!  bchesmer | 07/08/05
Federal Law and Mooching  mtrotz | 07/08/05
Sort of  osreinstall | 07/09/05
Common Sense  cobalt54 | 07/10/05
Wow. The people here who try to justify theft with  John Zern | 07/11/05
Hardly  tic swayback | 07/11/05
It's not theft  twinkler@... | 07/11/05
It could be considered theft  b_t_f@... | 07/24/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc