On GameFAQs: The top 10 forgotten RPGs
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 15 of 50:
Next »
« Previous
Sure...
"The only argument that you've made is that because you don't care about WiFi, its OK but since you do care about your home, its not. The idea of theft only matters if you care?"

You have answered your question. The idea of theft only matters if you you care - thats right. I leave my old couch outside my house so someone can benefit from it and take it away. Its useless to me but may be useful to somebody. The person picking-up the couch is not stealing it. Same way my unused bandwidth is of no use to me - so I give it to community.

As for not knowing how to secure it: even a child can setup password based security. If you don't I would assume that you don't care.

"Even if you want to provide your connection to anyone, unless you invite that person to use it, how would they know that they aren't stealing your signal?

If you know how wireless handshaking occurs, you would not be asking this. Someone already explained this above but i'll do it again for you. The guest computer requests the connection and hosts grants that connection. All done without human intervention. Again No breaking into your house analogy - you requested and you were granted access.
Posted by: low-life   Posted on: 07/08/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Interesting question arises -  klmmicro | 07/08/05
concordance  wlabarre@... | 07/08/05
I wonder how they'll handle open wifi  Nigel Johnstone | 07/08/05
Yup  Protector | 07/08/05
Invent a law again  Nigel Johnstone | 07/08/05
All depends  ibabadur1 | 07/08/05
Intentionally accessing your house at 3:00 AM  Knorthern Knight | 07/08/05
The Law  nkallner@... | 07/08/05
There's more to this than we're being told...  BitTwiddler | 07/08/05
No way to know  tic swayback | 07/08/05
THIS IS GETTING INSANE  Protector | 07/08/05
Same logic....  ibabadur1 | 07/08/05
Not true...  low-life | 07/08/05
I'm slow, so help me out here  ibabadur1 | 07/08/05
Sure...  low-life | 07/08/05
still not catching on  ibabadur1 | 07/08/05
Flawed analogies  tic swayback | 07/08/05
NOT!  bchesmer | 07/08/05
try this one  Dave F_z | 07/10/05
I do see one point in your argument.  low-life | 07/08/05
I see  ibabadur1 | 07/08/05
Re: I see  low-life | 07/08/05
Free Services  Vicissidude | 07/09/05
More Appropriate Metaphor  Vicissidude | 07/09/05
I Bet If He Worked For Homeland Security He Would Have Been Ok  itanalyst | 07/08/05
Open invitation  tic swayback | 07/08/05
Interesting thought  ibabadur1 | 07/08/05
Interference  tic swayback | 07/08/05
Next question  tic swayback | 07/08/05
Another Question  itanalyst | 07/08/05
When the RIAA comes knocking  GrumpyOldMan | 07/08/05
Right  tic swayback | 07/08/05
BULL!  raymanjr | 07/08/05
Using precedent . . .  Roger Ramjet | 07/08/05
Not sure I agree  tic swayback | 07/08/05
Might be true  Roger Ramjet | 07/08/05
Invitations  tic swayback | 07/08/05
Not true...  bchesmer | 07/08/05
That should be OK  Knorthern Knight | 07/08/05
Depends on the wording  tic swayback | 07/08/05
out of box experience  MIS Master | 07/08/05
Federal law and Wi-Fi mooching  realgomer | 07/08/05
You got it!  bchesmer | 07/08/05
Federal Law and Mooching  mtrotz | 07/08/05
Sort of  osreinstall | 07/09/05
Common Sense  cobalt54 | 07/10/05
Wow. The people here who try to justify theft with  John Zern | 07/11/05
Hardly  tic swayback | 07/11/05
It's not theft  twinkler@... | 07/11/05
It could be considered theft  b_t_f@... | 07/24/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here