U.K. mobile service strained after explosions

TalkBack 13 of 17:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

thank you again

"Like you, I muse about possibilities in the absence of evidence."

And isn't it irresponsible for our "leaders" to do the same? Before anything has been presented they are already screaming Al-Qaeda.
Yes, we are just postulating here. But once again, WHO stands to gain from this?? Al-Qaeda would gain nothing from this attack. What did this accomplish really? But now our G8 "leaders" no longer have to go over those antiquated things like African poverty and the failures of the Iraq/Afghanistan wars. Now they get to revert back to the "war on terror" and all its implications. So, once again, Al-Qaeda has played right into their enemy's hands. Isn't it soooo cute how all these "terror" acts ALWAYS benefit western powers?

"Assumption made on style of attack. Given that Al Quadea is known for simultaneous hitting of targets.."

And what style might that be? Can't EVERY terrorist organizaton attack like such? And how do we KNOW that Al-Qaeda always operates like this? Just because of one attack against America? Dude, the Columbine killers were "calculating", "cold", and were "known" for hitting multiple targets with "precise ruthless pinpoint accuracy" (these cute words make our "leaders" look like such important men)
What I trying to say is that these qualities are waaaaay too vague for us to automatically attribute them to Al-Qaeda. They can apply to ANYONE.

"In order for us to dialogue though I am not going to try to convert you from your position if you will do me the same honour."

Well isn't the whole point of dialoguing to come to a new conclusion about things? What's the sense in debating if we always fall back on our original thoughts?

"None apart from that very weird website (lost link sorry) claiming responsibility and ranting at Danish soldiers (wtf???)"

I will take that as an admission that they have NO evidence linking Al-Qaeda to this crime.
But hey, how much do you wanna bet that they will place the blame on them anyway (of course without providing a reason WHY they came to their "conclusions")? Isn't this not only irresponsible, but INCOMPETENT?

"Welsh Independance Fighters did it in protest at the Lions Test team to play the All Blacks on Saturday not having enough Welsh players in it."

And with that you have pointed out why there is no "war on terror": there has NEVER been any proof offered up that Al-Qaeda was behind the USS Cole or African embassy bombings. There is no proof that they were behind 9/11. There is no proof that there is an Al-Qaeda agent named Al Zarkawi in Iraq carrying out Al-Qaeda operations. Bush actually regularly quotes this ghost!! How much more sorry can it get?! He expects us to believe that he accurately quotes a man that they US supposedly can't even find or apprehend!! Bwahahahahaha!! What a bunch of crap!!

Posted by: Jeff Spicoli   Posted on: 07/08/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Cost-Effective IT Platform Is a Welcome Guest at Upscale and Luxury Hotel Chain Dell Wyndham International is a hotel chain renowned for offering personalized ... Download Now
• Virtualization: Architectural Considerations And Other Evaluation Criteria VMware Of the many approaches to x86 systems virtualization available in the ... Download Now
• Reducing Server Total Cost of Ownership with VMware Virtualization Software VMware VMware virtualization enables customers to reduce their server TCO and ... Download Now