On mySimon: Bare Escentuals Sweet Obsession
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 11 of 59:
Next »
« Previous
Past Court Decisions.....and negative impact
How much of the current security crisis came to pass because Microsoft was pressured into revealing more proprietary code than they otherwise would have? T.P. Jackson should have recused himself in favor of a more technically literate judge. Nowhere else in American business history can you find an instance of a company being prosecuted for giving away a product. Especially, a product that owes its origins to public funding (Mosaic).
If the legal system is not sophisticated enough to deal with the problem of inadverdant monopoly; then a modification of that system is warranted BEFORE an attempt is made to address the issue. The publicity surrounding that case encouraged too many people with criminal intent to absorb every bit of the newly available information on the inner workings of Microsoft products. In addition, Microsoft is going to have to do something about the amount of critical information that it makes available through MSDN and Technet. The assumption that all developers and integrators are honest cannot be afforded.
Unix and TCP/IP based systems have been hard to secure since their inception. It's unfortunate that the explosive growth of the Internet has forced even Microsoft to adopt a protocol set with known vulnerabilities. Microsoft's implementation is vulnerable because it's uniform and consistent over millions of systems. Linux/Unix, in comparison, allow individualized implementation of security policies on a per machine or per network basis; and the user base is smaller. If Red Hat or Suisse were forced to support tens of millions of users and a few thousand software and hardware developers, they would become as vulnerable as Microsoft in extremely short order.
The hardware based security solution is THE solution. Our defense, telephonic, and financial systems already have proven that. The problem lies in finding an economically non-disruptive means of implementing it. The Microsoft of old could have forced the issue in much the same manner that they forced the rewrite of graphics and ergonomic standards!
Posted by: thomgood   Posted on: 04/25/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

It looks more and more...  Rick_K | 04/25/05
Your post suggests you don't trust Microsoft.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 04/25/05
Darn, and those are the ones  FilledOut | 04/25/05
This is one I don't mind they scale back...  BitTwiddler | 04/25/05
You're right  alterego_z | 04/25/05
George Orwell, Not George Orville  nucrash | 04/25/05
Ouch!  alterego_z | 04/25/05
Have a second cup.  Anton Philidor | 04/25/05
A line of blow folds in nicely with it too  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
It's DEFINITELY about security... Microsoft's!  Xunil_Sierutuf | 04/25/05
Past Court Decisions.....and negative impact  thomgood | 04/25/05
Microsoft had security problems going all the way back to '96.  B.O.F.H. | 04/25/05
History lesson  thomgood | 04/26/05
hard to implement a hardware based solution?  linuxoverwindows | 04/26/05
Hardware based solutions and the Marketplace  thomgood | 04/26/05
Really, it looks...  Rick_K | 04/25/05
A Palladium in yer bung!  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
one thing  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
twice the ram...  Arm A. Geddon | 04/25/05
Still waiting.  nucrash | 04/25/05
i will fill in the blank...  linuxoverwindows | 04/26/05
Trust Microsoft..?  Xunil_Sierutuf | 04/25/05
They said they would get rid of BSOD...  nucrash | 04/25/05
You can stll see the BSOD in Windows XP  theding0 | 04/25/05
it will be a nucrash  linuxoverwindows | 04/26/05
Longhotn is still coming trust us  crocd | 04/25/05
Will it come before Bruce Willis saves the world?  Xunil_Sierutuf | 04/25/05
Encrypted Filesystems?  jstead1 | 04/25/05
All part of Microsoft's continued marketing deception..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 04/25/05
It can  rpmyers1 | 04/25/05
In other words...  nucrash | 04/25/05
A nice Stiffhorn in the rump  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
Sorry, Passport is down.  nucrash | 04/25/05
Well you just enjoy whatever floats your boat  FilledOut | 04/25/05
Great News!  Roger Ramjet | 04/25/05
not only that..  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
Or damaging documents?  Rick_K | 04/25/05
Come on now, they're making some progress  Chad_z | 04/25/05
Microsoft: 'Trusted Windows' still coming, trust us  Loverock Davidson | 04/25/05
Wow, sounds like something written on a pamphlet..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 04/25/05
yeah  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
What effort?  tic swayback | 04/25/05
Wow.  Judas I. | 04/25/05
trusted BSD is already here, why is Microsoft late?  B.O.F.H. | 04/25/05
Hofstadter Inc.  Techscan | 04/25/05
Actually  skeptic tank | 04/25/05
There's some good news here.  Anton Philidor | 04/25/05
Now there's an idea!  Jeff Spicoli | 04/25/05
Product activation is Microsoft only...  Anton Philidor | 04/25/05
Mixed Feelings  osreinstall | 04/25/05
"Will the customer remember his password."  Anton Philidor | 04/25/05
Of course not  Yagotta B. Kidding | 04/26/05
RE; Yagotta B. Kidding's remarks.  Rincon Bikerider | 04/26/05
Password doesn't have to be Admin password  osreinstall | 04/26/05
Vaporware  DarthRidiculous | 04/25/05
From RealNetworks  Reverend MacFellow | 04/26/05
Hmmmmm  zomalaja | 04/26/05
Security... for whom? Me? Or Microsoft?  Root User | 05/10/05
Joke of the Century !  wwwsupport | 04/26/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here