On CHOW: Easy Thanksgiving for beginners
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 26 of 29:
Next »
« Previous
Symantec=No problems for me=head in sand
By the heading of your message we can all tell what kind of expert you are (check your spelling). I've had nearly 30 years of computer experience, including more than 20 years of PC experience; and Norton Antivirus hs definitely slipping. Running the IT side of a consulting company I can tell you that Norton's quality has been continually slipping - especially in the last 3-4 years - when it comes to antivirus. They are late to detect threats and in some cases never catch them. We have clients that are switching by the droves to other software such as Eset's NOD32 and Computer Associates eTrust Antivirus because Norton misses trojans and virus applications as well as impacts performance on systems. Their corporate antivirus version 10 impacts performance so severely that it has forced some enterprise clients to make sure that all of their systems are at least 2.66Ghz Pentium 4 systems with a minimum of 512Mb of memory.

Before you start attacking everyone's abilities, perhaps you should take a look at real-world computing where not everyone uses AMD Athlon 64 3000+ processors. There are a LOT of 2.0Ghz and 2.4Ghz systems out there with 256Mb of RAM that Norton antivirus solutions from 2004 and 2005 will bring to their knees because of being so CPU intensive.
Posted by: rmerts@...   Posted on: 07/27/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

First Fix Your Own House  Techscan | 03/30/05
The Tom DeLay School of Media Manipulation (nt)  Judas I. | 03/30/05
Local Access?  rpmyers1 | 03/30/05
Wow, my old Norton would be great  FilledOut | 03/30/05
"Symantec has reported glitches in its antivirus software"  KOS-MOS | 03/30/05
Very Unlikely...  DarbyOhara | 03/31/05
Protect yourself with a Virtual PC  alterego_z | 03/30/05
Imagine that!  bony tryan | 03/30/05
Depends on what "remotely" means  rpmyers1 | 03/30/05
Deep Incompetence  michael-t | 03/30/05
Fed up of having to re-install  grandad_z | 03/30/05
re: Fed up of having to re-install  Wolfie2K3 | 03/30/05
major flaws in Symantec software for 3 yrs  gilde | 03/30/05
AVG  miked@... | 03/31/05
Norton Sucks  bammike | 03/31/05
Yes it does!  Fizban | 03/31/05
My next AV will not be Norton  jpr75_z | 03/31/05
Symantic Software  hinm@... | 03/31/05
2005 was not out 2 years ago  grandad_z | 03/31/05
Norton Antivirus and SystemWorks 2005 On Its 3rd Installation!  Automate | 05/28/05
software testing is a continual necessity. just ask M$ how they debug their  wessonjoe | 03/31/05
Symantec lies and manipulation  Im1CrazyCow | 03/31/05
You do back up your work?  osreinstall | 03/31/05
Symeantec= no problems for me  AZR | 04/04/05
Symantec = No Problems?  SeenITAll | 07/27/05
Symantec=No problems for me=head in sand  rmerts@... | 07/27/05
I agree  jkozura_z | 07/27/05
new vulnerabilities in AV Software  pthomassr | 06/24/05
Norton/Symantec has worked for me  dkroger@... | 09/02/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here