On mySimon: Holiday Gifts For The Hostess
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 18 of 46:
Next »
« Previous
Corporate vigilantism?
"I'd consider litigation against broad numbers of their customers as corporate vigilantism."

Actually, litigation by definition would not be vigilantism. Vigilantism would be taking action outside of the legal system. It's debatable whether or not the pressure applied by the RIAA to get ISPs to turn over the names of P2P users would qualify as vigilantism (since, by a broad interpretation, a law actually gave them the tools to do that), but taking legal actions against even its customers would not be "corporate vigilantism".

Carl Rapson
Posted by: rapson   Posted on: 12/12/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Additional info:  John Le'Brecage | 12/11/03
SCO's FTP site is still up  doctormoriarty | 12/12/03
What a pity Linux is so secure...  Jomo_z | 12/12/03
Poetic Justice  GRindinAxTaRupy | 12/11/03
LOR  LinuxHippie | 12/11/03
And why not?  kingrollo | 12/12/03
Exactly..well said  GRindinAxTaRupy | 12/12/03
Right vs. Wrong  charlieot | 12/12/03
Revisionist history?  jasonp@... | 12/12/03
Gotta disagree  charlieot | 12/12/03
Exactly! You hit it right on the head!  GRindinAxTaRupy | 12/12/03
You have officially arived in Bliss  LinuxHippie | 12/12/03
Some perspective please  GRindinAxTaRupy | 12/12/03
It's all a matter of perspective.  rapson | 12/12/03
Oh no  GRindinAxTaRupy | 12/12/03
So you know me.  LinuxHippie | 12/12/03
But this is war  Chad_z | 12/12/03
Corporate vigilantism?  rapson | 12/12/03
Net admins say "Probably not an attack at all"  jeromedavies | 12/11/03
1 + 1 != 2  in-DUH-vidual | 12/11/03
The hacker pussies will eventually end up in jail  marksashton | 12/11/03
Where is the hacker  gilgamesh_z | 12/11/03
How to stall by SCO  pconr01 | 12/11/03
Re: How To Stall  RoyTyrellFl | 12/11/03
It's not going to work  Chad_z | 12/12/03
M'kay...  plungermonkey@... | 12/12/03
Not so fast!!!  lchevere | 12/13/03
i agree with you  JWatson77 | 12/13/03
You mean Darl McBride? The "attack" is BOGUS and article is FUD incarnate.  dicktaurus@... | 12/11/03
(NT) 26 more days and counting  toomuchgreeatea@... | 12/11/03
Let me reintroduce the real linux community from the attack  pa2004 | 12/12/03
Astroturfer, reveal yourself.  cybervegan | 12/12/03
Don't feed trolls  Mack DaNife | 12/12/03
Yes, and...  BitTwiddler | 12/12/03
"we are not making this up"  tero_t_vaananen@... | 12/12/03
Either they're responding to Groklaw...  doctormoriarty | 12/12/03
Prove it SCO  timb@... | 12/12/03
Oh The Humanity  bit_rot | 12/12/03
Why is it allowed? Because...  ejhonda | 12/12/03
stupid  lotta_anger | 12/12/03
Oh...  plungermonkey@... | 12/12/03
Aw, the little children are throwing a fit.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/12/03
..And of course you're not included right?...  GRindinAxTaRupy | 12/12/03
Little children?  IT_Firefighter | 12/12/03
Don't be so hard on Darl  Robert Crocker | 12/12/03
I agree with you...  B.O.F.H. | 12/12/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement