On BNET: Apple's insanely great marketing
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 14 of 34:
Next »
« Previous
I would restrict them only in terms of a legitimate vs
ill-legitimate claim. I lean towards the ancient laws
myself..clean and simple. If a builder of a house makes a home
for a man and the house is made poorly so that it collapses and
kills the owner the builder also dies. If the collapse kills the
owners wife the builder's wife dies. If a collapse kills the owners
children then the builders child dies. I tend to bet that people
went to extremes to do a job right back in the day. Ah the good
old days, and responsibility. I'll be the old days had some cool
laws where ill-legitimate claims were concerned as well....:)

Pagan jim
Posted by: Laff   Posted on: 02/26/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Guess what?  gfeier | 02/25/05
To Late...I'm already uncomfotable.  Laff | 02/25/05
Can anything more be said?  Jeff Spicoli | 02/25/05
Whoopee Do  Chad_z | 02/25/05
What I want to know is.....  turmith@... | 02/26/05
Nothing will ever happen to them as a consequence, either.  thetwonkey | 02/26/05
Time for serious privacy laws is now....  redstone | 02/26/05
What I find odd is that the administration is currently  Laff | 02/26/05
Or serving hot coffee...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/26/05
While I agree there have been abuses...still taking away  Laff | 02/26/05
The administration is not ...  ShadeTree | 02/28/05
No Panels, But peer review with  Update victim | 02/28/05
unrestricted torts are a big problem.  maxo_z | 02/26/05
I would restrict them only in terms of a legitimate vs  Laff | 02/26/05
Why should associationg make one guilty  voska | 02/28/05
I agree ... corporate shield is the problem  George Mitchell | 02/26/05
Agreed.  Update victim | 02/28/05
This is a surprise?  zclayton2 | 02/28/05
I bet they were Linux tapes.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/26/05
If they were ...  George Mitchell | 02/26/05
No they weren't, they were Windows tapes, dangit!  Jeff Spicoli | 02/26/05
Idiot magnet  LinuxHippie | 02/27/05
Now you stoop low enough to troll?  CobraA1 | 02/28/05
Since when is a 'million+' a "small" number?  marcvridenour | 02/26/05
"Small" number of TAPES  Hugh Jass | 02/26/05
To me, the article implies  Hugh Jass | 02/26/05
2 Day Saver or Ground shipping?  FirstNLastN | 02/26/05
Glad they got the big-wig's data also ...  Plain Logic | 02/27/05
Only an idiot doesn't encrypt backup tapes  SanfordOlson | 02/27/05
Oh My  Richard Flude | 02/28/05
If tapes are NOT reliable enough to encypt  Laff | 02/28/05
Only when the people responsible...  BitTwiddler | 02/28/05
Actually I think this works in the governments  Laff | 02/28/05
Finally!  Freelance Foto | 03/13/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here