On CHOW: This beer is perfect
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 34:
Next »
« Previous
While I agree there have been abuses...still taking away
the common man/womens ability to get justice and recompence
in cases where the mega corp has done legitimate wrong is NOT
the answer. Perhaps reviewing why a judge did NOT throw a
case out of court when it is painfully obvious that the case was a
sham....putting the judges very job on the line. Or better still
before every such case an panel representing people from the
legal proffesion, the mega corps and the average citizen
determine if a case is to be brought before a judge. Maybe
instead of lawyer representing the legal proffesion on this panel
it would be Law Proffesors, and those who represent coroporate
interests would be retired CEO's and such.

Pagan jim
Posted by: Laff   Posted on: 02/26/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Guess what?  gfeier | 02/25/05
To Late...I'm already uncomfotable.  Laff | 02/25/05
Can anything more be said?  Jeff Spicoli | 02/25/05
Whoopee Do  Chad_z | 02/25/05
What I want to know is.....  turmith@... | 02/26/05
Nothing will ever happen to them as a consequence, either.  thetwonkey | 02/26/05
Time for serious privacy laws is now....  redstone | 02/26/05
What I find odd is that the administration is currently  Laff | 02/26/05
Or serving hot coffee...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/26/05
While I agree there have been abuses...still taking away  Laff | 02/26/05
The administration is not ...  ShadeTree | 02/28/05
No Panels, But peer review with  Update victim | 02/28/05
unrestricted torts are a big problem.  maxo_z | 02/26/05
I would restrict them only in terms of a legitimate vs  Laff | 02/26/05
Why should associationg make one guilty  voska | 02/28/05
I agree ... corporate shield is the problem  George Mitchell | 02/26/05
Agreed.  Update victim | 02/28/05
This is a surprise?  zclayton2 | 02/28/05
I bet they were Linux tapes.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/26/05
If they were ...  George Mitchell | 02/26/05
No they weren't, they were Windows tapes, dangit!  Jeff Spicoli | 02/26/05
Idiot magnet  LinuxHippie | 02/27/05
Now you stoop low enough to troll?  CobraA1 | 02/28/05
Since when is a 'million+' a "small" number?  marcvridenour | 02/26/05
"Small" number of TAPES  Hugh Jass | 02/26/05
To me, the article implies  Hugh Jass | 02/26/05
2 Day Saver or Ground shipping?  FirstNLastN | 02/26/05
Glad they got the big-wig's data also ...  Plain Logic | 02/27/05
Only an idiot doesn't encrypt backup tapes  SanfordOlson | 02/27/05
Oh My  Richard Flude | 02/28/05
If tapes are NOT reliable enough to encypt  Laff | 02/28/05
Only when the people responsible...  BitTwiddler | 02/28/05
Actually I think this works in the governments  Laff | 02/28/05
Finally!  Freelance Foto | 03/13/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here