On mySimon: Gifts For The Outdoor Enthusiast
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 34:
Next »
« Previous
Nothing will ever happen to them as a consequence, either.
This is just another case of a monopolistic cost-cutting banking behemoth putting customer security and privacy secondary to their profits. Actually, customer concerns come in dead last to all others, with idiot banks like B of A running the show. Why anyone with an ounce of concern for their privacy, security, and financial well-being would continue to do business with those fools is simply beyond comprehension. Security takes time and money, and B of A simply couldn't be bothered to expend enough of either. All million customers will probably be victimized by identity thieves somewhere down the line, and B of A will bury them with bogus overdraft charges and phony lines of credit, expecting payment in full immediately or turning them over to collections. This is how banking in this country runs nowadays, and the consumer is without any recourse whatsoever, given Bush and his cronies demonstrated fondness for favoring businesses over consumers. Expect more of this garbage, not less. It's only a matter of time before frauds so massive that it's unparalleled in history will bury the economy of the US, and only the big money boys will escape unscathed. Everyone else will be reduced to impoverishment, which is exactly what they want. Isn't it just a little ironic that identity thieves use the very banks that they defraud to deposit and transit their ill-gotten gains? Makes you wonder about the degree of cooperation they get from said banks, eh?
Posted by: thetwonkey   Posted on: 02/26/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Guess what?  gfeier | 02/25/05
To Late...I'm already uncomfotable.  Laff | 02/25/05
Can anything more be said?  Jeff Spicoli | 02/25/05
Whoopee Do  Chad_z | 02/25/05
What I want to know is.....  turmith@... | 02/26/05
Nothing will ever happen to them as a consequence, either.  thetwonkey | 02/26/05
Time for serious privacy laws is now....  redstone | 02/26/05
What I find odd is that the administration is currently  Laff | 02/26/05
Or serving hot coffee...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/26/05
While I agree there have been abuses...still taking away  Laff | 02/26/05
The administration is not ...  ShadeTree | 02/28/05
No Panels, But peer review with  Update victim | 02/28/05
unrestricted torts are a big problem.  maxo_z | 02/26/05
I would restrict them only in terms of a legitimate vs  Laff | 02/26/05
Why should associationg make one guilty  voska | 02/28/05
I agree ... corporate shield is the problem  George Mitchell | 02/26/05
Agreed.  Update victim | 02/28/05
This is a surprise?  zclayton2 | 02/28/05
I bet they were Linux tapes.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/26/05
If they were ...  George Mitchell | 02/26/05
No they weren't, they were Windows tapes, dangit!  Jeff Spicoli | 02/26/05
Idiot magnet  LinuxHippie | 02/27/05
Now you stoop low enough to troll?  CobraA1 | 02/28/05
Since when is a 'million+' a "small" number?  marcvridenour | 02/26/05
"Small" number of TAPES  Hugh Jass | 02/26/05
To me, the article implies  Hugh Jass | 02/26/05
2 Day Saver or Ground shipping?  FirstNLastN | 02/26/05
Glad they got the big-wig's data also ...  Plain Logic | 02/27/05
Only an idiot doesn't encrypt backup tapes  SanfordOlson | 02/27/05
Oh My  Richard Flude | 02/28/05
If tapes are NOT reliable enough to encypt  Laff | 02/28/05
Only when the people responsible...  BitTwiddler | 02/28/05
Actually I think this works in the governments  Laff | 02/28/05
Finally!  Freelance Foto | 03/13/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here