The case hasn't tamed the growth of Linux sales.
Jose Jimenez | 12/10/03
|
Wow, their web storefront crippled
FilledOut | 12/10/03
|

just desserts
Lunpa | 12/11/03
|
were they
JWatson77 | 12/10/03
|

Whoever they are ...
ltw1958 | 12/11/03
|
What a horrible thing.
DpuTiger | 12/10/03
|

no one is attacking their site
doh123 | 12/10/03
|
like their last assault?
ryusen | 12/10/03
|
Who Cares? They aren't selling anything anyway - only revenue from LAW SUIT
Plain Logic | 12/10/03
|

maby they should go into selling clothing
Lunpa | 12/11/03
|
 
read the other one...
Lunpa | 12/11/03
|

maby they should go into selling clothing
Lunpa | 12/11/03
|
ship is sinking
Arrg | 12/10/03
|
A question to the SCO.
Vily Clay | 12/10/03
|
Now how's Sun suppose to check
FilledOut | 12/10/03
|
Funny but fair
nite_w0lf | 12/10/03
|

What SCO Runs
nucrash | 12/11/03
|
The story is wrong-- no such attack
RestonTechAlec | 12/10/03
|
They said their lawyers were on contingency, too
Robert Hahn | 12/10/03
|
Unfortunate, really.
Frihet | 12/11/03
|

Unfortunate, really -- oops.
Frihet | 12/11/03
|
Finally - a hack that makes sense
ejhonda | 12/11/03
|
Bogus or incompetent
Robert Crocker | 12/11/03
|
Another SCO fraud!
George Mitchell | 12/11/03
|

Don't they call it "Munchausen Syndrome"?
doctormoriarty | 12/11/03
|
This doesn't help.
Damon K | 12/11/03
|
Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch than SCO
Sunny Jalolly | 12/11/03
|
another example of bad journalism...
stmueller | 12/11/03
|
WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG
BanjoPaterson | 12/11/03
|

Make that www.groklaw.net
BanjoPaterson | 12/11/03
|
How come they disappeared from DNS too?
scott.marlowe@... | 12/11/03
|
"Probably not an attack" say net-admins
jeromedavies | 12/11/03
|
Well thats rich kid
FilledOut | 12/12/03
|