On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 45 of 54:
Next »
« Previous
Internet Explorer 7.0 from scratch
Rebuilding Internet Explorer 7 from scratch with the security in mind is the way to go. You could've built Internet Explorer 6 from scratch but please don't take my offense from me. I know, Microsoft, that you're improving Internet Explorer's security but it would be nice if don't add new features to existing version of Internet Explorer and rebuild Internet Explorer from scratch per version. So for example, instead of adding a tab browsing feature to Internet Explorer and make it Internet Explorer 7, rebuild Internet Explorer 7 from scratch, add a tab browser feature to Internet Explorer 7, improve the features of Internet Explorer, strengthen security, plus adding extra security features, and when Internet Explorer 7 is feature-/security-complete, you can now release the new version of Internet Explorer 7 to the Internet. Do the same for new version of Internet Explorer. My rule is:

1. Rebuild a new version of Internet Explorer
2. Strenghten the security
3. Add extra security features while doing step 2.
4. Add extra features to Internet Explorer.
5. Strenghthing up the features' security if need be.
6. Do it again from step 2 and make sure that there aren't any flaws in your code.
7. Test Internet Explorer 7 to make sure that Internet Explorer 7 is secure.
8. When done, release it to the Internet.

Of course, not only for Internet Explorer, do the same for Windows and Office Suite. So in that case: rebuild, rebuild, rebuild. That's my rule! happy I know that you (Microsoft) are working on Longhorn BUT: Like Internet Explorer, build Longhorn with SECURITY IN MIND!

Most of all Microsoft, security is the #1 and should be in the top of your list; I know that security is the #1 for you but I'm trying to get your heads up on when you're writing applications and operating systems. So if you do what I mentioned above, then you should be in GOOD shape. Last, but not least, I'm hoping that you will be able to surpass competitors' products like Linux and Firefox (not a nice name to me, IMO :p), in security and features, plus, this can help you improving your coding skills and this will help you write robust code for the future of Windows, Internet Explorer, Office, Visual Studio, etc.

Thank you for taking your time on reading this and I look forward on what products you're going to be showing off (from Microsoft) in the future.
Posted by: Grayson Peddie   Posted on: 02/19/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Well DUH !!!  realitycheck101 | 02/18/05
MS is the only  michael-t | 02/18/05
The conspiracy is unmasked!  jimmyjoebobalooba | 02/19/05
I will take it under advisement. - NT  osreinstall | 02/19/05
U R Funny  FilledOut | 02/18/05
I'm not a MS fan, but...  doh123 | 02/18/05
What he is saying is Microsoft needs to fix  bjbrock | 02/18/05
What makes you think that isn't happening?  jimmyjoebobalooba | 02/19/05
Still waiting for that Win3.1 patch  FilledOut | 02/20/05
IMO it's pretty obvious  alterego_z | 02/18/05
MS found a new revenue stream  AmusedAtItAll | 02/18/05
Who the heck is Neil MacDonald...  Real World | 02/18/05
We are a 2000 shop and  Arrg | 02/18/05
Just don't forget  FilledOut | 02/20/05
ie 7 only for xp  jjanks | 02/18/05
This will change..  Jeff Spicoli | 02/19/05
Isn't 50% of the Windows using population on 98 or ME still?  jvahabzadeh | 02/22/05
Gartner is silly  samp_z | 02/18/05
Problem here is...  DragonBRockin | 02/18/05
MS is making more mistakes  mgombos@... | 02/19/05
I agree with...  KOS-MOS | 02/19/05
I disagree with "I agree with" (but only partly)  jimmyjoebobalooba | 02/19/05
ummm.. yeh.  jimmyjoebobalooba | 02/19/05
Someone is living in a dream world...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/19/05
Axe obviously never heard of safety critical systems  whisperycat | 02/19/05
Sorry, they fail too.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/21/05
Yes but..  Jeff Spicoli | 02/19/05
Ok, assume a "near perfect" system.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/21/05
Of course there is  Richard Flude | 02/20/05
So, show me...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/21/05
say you can drive to work or take the metro train  hipparchus2000 | 02/21/05
Were trying to make some sort of point?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/21/05
Yes No_Ax, We Know You're Living In Neverland  itanalyst | 02/21/05
Edumacation for AX  Nullifidian | 02/21/05
Mainframes are never hacked?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/21/05
it doesn't matter IF they are hacked or not, it's how often they are hacked  hipparchus2000 | 02/21/05
4get replying to the AX using logic  Nullifidian | 02/21/05
No that was your silly statement.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/21/05
perfectly secure systems?  Nullifidian | 02/22/05
Ummm, all it takes is once.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/21/05
everyones a fool but you...  Nullifidian | 02/22/05
You should do some research, this is old stuff!  B.O.F.H. | 02/21/05
no such thing as secure software...? Actually there is  hipparchus2000 | 02/21/05
You need reading lessons.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/21/05
Internet Explorer 7.0 from scratch  Grayson Peddie | 02/19/05
Or pay for attacks  Martin Marvinski | 02/19/05
IE6  jsjag1 | 02/21/05
Not Possible  Mack DaNife | 02/21/05
Ah...yes. You're right.  Grayson Peddie | 02/21/05
Another idiot think tank  osreinstall | 02/19/05
white list for executables  Grayson Peddie | 02/19/05
Re: white list for executables  Anti_Zealot | 02/21/05
And nobody will hack the list?  gordon@... | 02/21/05
It wont be hard  osreinstall | 02/21/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here